Voting record
How Sonia Sotomayor voted in the October Term 2018 (2018–2019)
Term at a glance
- Majority
- 33
- Concurrence
- 3
- Dissent
- 12
- Recusal
- 0
- Authored
- 14
Every tracked vote
DecidedLinda H. Lamone, et al., Appellants v. O. John Benisek, et al.DecidedVoteDissent18-726DecidedDepartment of Commerce v. New YorkDecidedVoteMajority18-966DecidedUnited States v. HaymondDecidedVoteMajority17-1672DecidedKisor v. WilkieDecidedVoteMajority18-15DecidedTennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. ThomasDecidedVoteMajority18-96DecidedDutra Group v. BattertonDecidedVoteDissent18-266DecidedIancu v. BrunettiDecidedVoteDissentAuthored18-302DecidedUnited States v. DavisDecidedVoteMajority18-431DecidedFood Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader MediaDecidedVoteDissent18-481DecidedKnick v. Township of ScottDecidedVoteDissent17-647DecidedRehaif v. United StatesDecidedVoteMajority17-9560DecidedFlowers v. MississippiDecidedVoteMajority17-9572DecidedNorth Carolina Dept. of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family TrustDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored18-457DecidedVirginia Uranium, Inc. v. WarrenDecidedVoteMajority16-1275DecidedManhattan Community Access Corp. v. HalleckDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-1702DecidedGamble v. United StatesDecidedVoteMajority17-646DecidedVirginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-HillDecidedVoteMajority18-281DecidedReturn Mail, Inc. v. Postal ServiceDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored17-1594DecidedQuarles v. United StatesDecidedVoteMajority17-778DecidedParker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. NewtonDecidedVoteMajority18-389DecidedAlex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Allina Health Services, et al.DecidedVoteMajority17-1484DecidedMont v. United StatesDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-8995DecidedTaggart v. LorenzenDecidedVoteMajority18-489DecidedSmith v. BerryhillDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored17-1606DecidedKristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., et al.DecidedVoteMajority18-483DecidedMission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLCDecidedVoteConcurrenceAuthored17-1657DecidedHerrera v. WyomingDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored17-532DecidedFranchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. HyattDecidedVoteDissent17-1299DecidedApple, Inc. v. PepperDecidedVoteMajority17-204DecidedCochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. HuntDecidedVoteMajority18-315DecidedGary Thacker, et ux., Petitioners v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDecidedVoteMajority17-1201DecidedLamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-988DecidedBiestek v. BerryhillDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-1184DecidedBucklew v. PrecytheDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-8151DecidedRepublic of Sudan v. HarrisonDecidedVoteMajority16-1094DecidedSturgeon v. FrostDecidedVoteConcurrenceAuthored17-949DecidedObduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLPDecidedVoteConcurrenceAuthored17-1307DecidedFrank v. GaosDecidedVoteMajority17-961DecidedNielsen v. PreapDecidedVoteDissent16-1363DecidedWashington State Dept. of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc.DecidedVoteMajority16-1498DecidedAir & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVriesDecidedVoteMajority17-1104DecidedFourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.comDecidedVoteMajority17-571DecidedJam v. International Finance Corp.DecidedVoteMajority17-1011DecidedGarza v. IdahoDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored17-1026DecidedMadison v. AlabamaDecidedVoteMajority17-7505DecidedJim Yovino, Fresno County Superintendent of Schools, Petitioner v. Aileen RizoDecidedVoteMajority18-272DecidedTimbs v. IndianaDecidedVoteMajority17-1091DecidedDawson v. SteagerDecidedVoteMajority17-419
Agreement with other justices
| Justice | Agreement | Cases together |
|---|---|---|
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg | 92% | 44 of 48 |
| Elena Kagan | 90% | 43 of 48 |
| Stephen G. Breyer | 88% | 42 of 48 |
| John G. Roberts, Jr. | 63% | 30 of 48 |
| Neil Gorsuch | 63% | 30 of 48 |
| Brett M. Kavanaugh | 61% | 27 of 44 |
| Samuel A. Alito, Jr. | 52% | 25 of 48 |
| Clarence Thomas | 50% | 24 of 48 |
Methodology
Vote records come from Oyez and cover publicly tracked merits cases. Recusals are listed but excluded from agreement rates.
Two justices agree in a case when they land on the same side of the judgment: voting with the majority, including concurrences, or in dissent together. A case counts toward agreement rates only when at least 8 substantive votes are on record.