Skip to main content

Bucklew v. Precythe

Updated Sep 18, 2026

In brief

Missouri won: the Supreme Court rejected Bucklew's challenge to its lethal-injection method and left the lower court's ruling in place.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · April 1, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
Russell Bucklew, a death-row inmate with a unique medical condition, challenged Missouri's lethal injection protocol under the Eighth Amendment, arguing it would cause him severe pain.
Who it affects
The decision requires prisoners challenging an execution method, including because of an individual medical condition, to meet the Baze-Glossip test. In Bucklew's case, the lower court's rejection of his challenge remained in place.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Bucklew v. Precythe
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that he failed to meet his burden of proving a feasible alternative method of execution that would significantly reduce his risk of pain.

The case concerns how the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment applies when a prisoner says an otherwise lawful execution method would cause severe pain in that person's circumstances.

Question presented

Whether petitioner met his burden under Glossip v. [Gross]?

What the Court decided

Holding

Mr. Bucklew has failed to satisfy the Baze - Glossip test. Pp. 20– 28. 883 F. 3d 1087, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Thomaswrote the opinion
  2. Kavanaughalso wrote separately
  3. Roberts
  4. Gorsuchalso wrote separately
  5. Alito
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Breyerwrote a dissent
  2. Kagan
  3. Ginsburg
  4. Sotomayorwrote a dissent
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

From the opinions

“The majority holds that the State may execute him anyway.”

— Justice Stephen Breyer(dissent)

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its action in this case. Its decision left the Eighth Circuit's ruling against Bucklew in place.

Documents

3

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Apr 1, 2019 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Mar 15, 2018 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What did the Supreme Court decide in Bucklew v. Precythe?
The Court agreed with the Eighth Circuit and rejected Bucklew's challenge to Missouri's lethal-injection protocol. It ruled that he had not met the Baze-Glossip test.
Who won Bucklew v. Precythe?
Missouri won. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling against Russell Bucklew by a 5-4 vote.
What legal rule did the Court apply in Bucklew?
The Court said the Baze-Glossip test governs all Eighth Amendment claims that an execution method causes unconstitutionally cruel pain. That includes claims based on a prisoner's individual medical condition.
What happens next in Bucklew v. Precythe?
The Supreme Court's action is complete. The ruling from the Eighth Circuit remains in place.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis