Emergency docket
Requests for fast, temporary orders while a case goes on below, also called the shadow docket or the interim docket.
This week
Filed or ruled September 25, 2026 to October 8, 2026: argument first, then the federal government, recorded dissents, and executions.
By the numbers
- Granted47
- Denied391
- Awaiting action16
- Closed without a ruling18
Awaiting action (16)
Newest filing first. Held for argument and argued applications stay here until the Court rules.
Latest rulings (438 rulings, 18 closed without one on record)
Filed by the federal government (40)
The federal government, usually through the Solicitor General, asks the Court to pause lower-court orders against its policies. These are the applications people count when they talk about the shadow docket.
Key figures, as of October 9, 2026
Separate writings
- DissentMulkey v. AlabamaRead (PDF)
- DissentNelsen v. PikeRead (PDF)
- DissentPostal Service v. CaliforniaRead (PDF)
- DissentJones v. United StatesRead (PDF)
- DissentDoe v. HochulRead (PDF)
- DissentDershowitz v. Cable News Network, Inc.Read (PDF)
- DissentSmith v. KindRead (PDF)
- DissentGrayson v. United StatesRead (PDF)
- DissentUnited States v. CarterRead (PDF)
- DissentSaldaño v. TexasRead (PDF)
- DissentAlabama v. PowellRead (PDF)
- DissentE.D. v. Noblesville School DistrictRead (PDF)
How this tracker works
Applications are found by walking the Court's application numbers in order and by reading its orders, so each one is tracked from the day it is filed; requests for more time are not tracked. A page publishes as soon as the docket record reads cleanly; the plain-English answers are written from the docket, the application, the ruling below, and the Court's own orders and opinions. Votes are shown only where the Court recorded them. The methodology documents the dataset's columns and filters.