No. 17-1011October Term 2018Decided Feb 27, 2019
Jam v. International Finance Corp.
The dispute centered on how much legal protection international organizations have from being sued in U.S. courts.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Feb 27, 2019
- What it's about
This case asked whether the International Finance Corporation, an international organization, could claim the same broad immunity from lawsuits that foreign governments had in 1945, or only the narrower immunity foreign governments have today. The suit arose after residents of Gujarat, India, alleged that a power plant financed by the IFC caused serious environmental harm.
Question presented
1. Whether the International Organizations Immunities Act-which affords international organizations the "same immunity" from suit that foreign governments have, 22 U.S.C. § 288a (b)- confers the same immunity on such organizations as foreign governments have under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602-11. 2. If not, what are the rules governing the immunity to which international organizations are entitled?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Feb 27, 2019
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
This case asked whether the International Finance Corporation could claim the broad lawsuit immunity foreign governments had in 1945, or only the narrower immunity foreign governments have today. The Supreme Court issued a decision on Feb. 27, 2019, after hearing arguments on Oct. 31, 2018.
Impact
The answer affects whether people can sue international organizations in U.S. courts when projects they finance allegedly cause harm. That matters for residents, lenders, and development projects like the Gujarat power plant at issue here.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further practical steps would happen in lower courts or outside the Court based on the decision.
What was the core dispute in Jam v. International Finance Corp.?
The case asked what level of immunity the IFC gets under a 1945 federal law. Residents argued the organization should have only the narrower immunity foreign governments have today.
Why could this case affect people beyond this one power plant fight?
International organizations finance projects around the world. The immunity rule can shape whether communities may bring U.S. lawsuits over alleged environmental or other harms.
What is the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's action here?
The Supreme Court is done with this case. Any remaining proceedings would take place in lower courts, not through another merits step at the justices' level.
Decision
What the Court decided
The dispute centered on how much legal protection international organizations have from being sued in U.S. courts.
Impact
The answer affects whether people can sue international organizations in U.S. courts when projects they finance allegedly cause harm. That matters for residents, lenders, and development projects like the Gujarat power plant at issue here.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 17-1011
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Feb 27, 2019
Petition
brief | Jan 19, 2018
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Dec 1, 2017
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026