Skip to main content

No. 17-1011October Term 2018Decided Feb 27, 2019

Docket 17-1011October Term 2018 (2018–2019)

Jam v. International Finance Corp.

The dispute centered on how much legal protection international organizations have from being sued in U.S. courts.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Feb 27, 2019
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedFeb 27, 2019
What it's about

This case asked whether the International Finance Corporation, an international organization, could claim the same broad immunity from lawsuits that foreign governments had in 1945, or only the narrower immunity foreign governments have today. The suit arose after residents of Gujarat, India, alleged that a power plant financed by the IFC caused serious environmental harm.

Question presented

1. Whether the International Organizations Immunities Act-which affords international organizations the "same immunity" from suit that foreign governments have, 22 U.S.C. § 288a (b)- confers the same immunity on such organizations as foreign governments have under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602-11. 2. If not, what are the rules governing the immunity to which international organizations are entitled?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit / Decision released Feb 27, 2019

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

This case asked whether the International Finance Corporation could claim the broad lawsuit immunity foreign governments had in 1945, or only the narrower immunity foreign governments have today. The Supreme Court issued a decision on Feb. 27, 2019, after hearing arguments on Oct. 31, 2018.

Impact

The answer affects whether people can sue international organizations in U.S. courts when projects they finance allegedly cause harm. That matters for residents, lenders, and development projects like the Gujarat power plant at issue here.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further practical steps would happen in lower courts or outside the Court based on the decision.

What was the core dispute in Jam v. International Finance Corp.?

The case asked what level of immunity the IFC gets under a 1945 federal law. Residents argued the organization should have only the narrower immunity foreign governments have today.

Why could this case affect people beyond this one power plant fight?

International organizations finance projects around the world. The immunity rule can shape whether communities may bring U.S. lawsuits over alleged environmental or other harms.

What is the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's action here?

The Supreme Court is done with this case. Any remaining proceedings would take place in lower courts, not through another merits step at the justices' level.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The dispute centered on how much legal protection international organizations have from being sued in U.S. courts.

Impact

The answer affects whether people can sue international organizations in U.S. courts when projects they finance allegedly cause harm. That matters for residents, lenders, and development projects like the Gujarat power plant at issue here.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents