Skip to main content

Taxes on railroad back pay

BNSF R. v. Loos

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

BNSF won the tax question: its payment to Loos for missed work counts as taxable pay, and the Eighth Circuit’s ruling was overturned.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 7-2 · March 4, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
The Supreme Court ruled that BNSF’s payment to Michael Loos for work time he missed because of an on-the-job injury counted as taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act.
Who it affects
BNSF’s payment to Loos for work time he missed because of an on-the-job injury is subject to tax under the Act.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for BNSF R. Co. v. Loos
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

It overturned the Eighth Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).

Justice Gorsuch’s dissent says Loos injured his knee after falling into a hidden drainage grate in a train yard, missed work for months, and later sued BNSF after it moved to fire him over attendance.

The dispute arose because BNSF treated part of Loos’s damages for missed work as taxable compensation.

Question presented

Whether a railroad's payment to an employee for time lost from work is subject to employment taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act?

What the Court decided

Holding

A railroad’s payment to an employee for working time lost due to an on-the-job injury is taxable “compensation” under the RRTA. 865 F. 3d 1106, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Kavanaugh
  4. Ginsburgwrote the opinion
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Roberts
  7. Alito
Dissenting · 2disagreed with the result
  1. Thomas
  2. Gorsuchwrote the dissent
7 justices joined the judgment, 2 dissented.

From the opinions

“Today, the Court agrees with the company. Respectfully, I do not.”

— Justice Gorsuch(dissent)

What's next

The Eighth Circuit will take up the case again and apply the Supreme Court’s ruling that the lost-work-time payment is taxable compensation.

Documents

4

Docket activity

13
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Loos

    Mar 4, 2019 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Mar 4, 2019 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 23, 2018 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis