Skip to main content

Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt

Updated Sep 18, 2026

In brief

California could not be sued by Gilbert Hyatt in Nevada state court without California’s consent.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · May 13, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
This case asked whether Gilbert Hyatt could keep suing California’s Franchise Tax Board in Nevada state court for alleged misconduct during a tax audit.
Who it affects
A private person generally cannot sue one state in another state’s courts unless the state agrees. The ruling ended the rule that had let each state decide whether to give another state that protection.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court used the case to decide whether states have sovereign immunity from private suits in other states’ courts and ultimately overruled Nevada v. Hall.

The case resolved a long-running dispute over whether the Constitution requires states to respect one another’s immunity from private lawsuits.

Question presented

Whether Nevada v. Hall , 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State's courts without its consent, should be overruled.

What the Court decided

Holding

Nevada v. Hall is overruled; States retain their sovereign immunity from private suits brought in courts of other States. 133 Nev. ___, 407 P. 3d 717, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Thomaswrote the opinion
  2. Roberts
  3. Alito
  4. Gorsuch
  5. Kavanaugh
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Breyerwrote the dissent
  2. Ginsburg
  3. Kagan
  4. Sotomayor
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

From the opinions

“I can find no good reason to overrule Hall , however, and I consequently dissent.”

— Justice Breyer(dissent)

What's next

The case returned to the Nevada Supreme Court for further action consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling. The Supreme Court has finished its work on this docket.

Documents

3

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Jul 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    May 13, 2019 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Mar 12, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What did Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt decide?
The Court said states cannot be sued by private people in another state’s courts without consent. It overturned Nevada v. Hall.
Who won in the Supreme Court?
California’s Franchise Tax Board won. The Court overturned the Nevada Supreme Court’s judgment and sent the case back.
How did the justices vote in Hyatt?
The Court ruled 5-4. Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion, while Justice Breyer wrote for the four dissenting justices.
What happens next in the Hyatt case?
The Nevada Supreme Court must handle the case under the new rule. The Supreme Court has sent the case back to Nevada.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis