Skip to main content

No. 17-9572October Term 2018Decided Jun 21, 2019

Docket 17-9572October Term 2018 (2018–2019)

Flowers v. Mississippi

This case asked whether Curtis Flowers’s murder conviction from his sixth trial could stand when the same prosecutor had repeatedly struck Black jurors across Flowers’s earlier trials and again removed most Black prospective jurors at the sixth trial.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 21, 2019
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 21, 2019
What it's about

This case asked whether Curtis Flowers’s murder conviction from his sixth trial could stand when the same prosecutor had repeatedly struck Black jurors across Flowers’s earlier trials and again removed most Black prospective jurors at the sixth trial. The Supreme Court held that the trial court clearly erred in finding no racial discrimination in the prosecutor’s strike of a Black prospective juror.

Question presented

1. WHETHER THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ERRED IN HOW IT APPLIED BATSON v. KENTUCKY, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) IN THIS CASE. 2. Whether a prosecutor's history of adjudicated purposeful race discrimination may be dismissed as irrelevant when assessing the credibility of his proffered explanations for peremptory strikes against minority prospective jurors?

Case path

Supreme Court of Mississippi / Decision released Jun 21, 2019

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Timing

Decided June 21, 2019

The Court released its decision on June 21, 2019 without hearing oral argument.