Skip to main content

No. 17-1104October Term 2018Decided Mar 19, 2019

Docket 17-1104October Term 2018 (2018–2019)

Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries

Under maritime law, an equipment maker may have to warn about asbestos risks from later-added parts if its own product depended on those parts and made the danger foreseeable.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Mar 19, 2019
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMar 19, 2019
What it's about

This case was about when, under maritime law, equipment manufacturers must warn users about the dangers of asbestos in insulation or replacement parts that were later added by the Navy or other third parties. The Court held that a manufacturer has that duty to warn when its product requires the later-added part to work as intended, the finished product is likely dangerous, and the manufacturer has no reason to think users would already know about the danger.

Question presented

Can products-liability defendants be held liable under maritime law for injuries caused by products that they did not make, sell, or distribute?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Mar 19, 2019

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The case asked when makers of Navy equipment must warn about asbestos dangers from insulation or replacement parts later added by the Navy or other third parties. The Court said they can have that duty under maritime law when the equipment needs the added part to work as intended, the finished product is likely dangerous, and users would not already know the risk.

Impact

The decision affects maritime asbestos lawsuits against equipment makers, even when they did not make or sell the asbestos-containing part itself. For example, sailors or shipyard workers may still sue if a pump or boiler required asbestos parts to work and the danger was not obvious.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this case. Lower courts must now apply this warning-duty test in future maritime asbestos cases involving equipment and later-added parts.

What was the main fight in Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries?

The dispute was whether equipment makers could be liable for failing to warn about asbestos in parts they did not make or sell. The Court said yes in some circumstances.

Who is most affected by this decision in the real world?

Sailors, shipyard workers, and equipment manufacturers are directly affected. The ruling can shape asbestos injury claims involving pumps, boilers, and other ship equipment.

What happens after the Supreme Court's decision in this case?

The Supreme Court's role is over. Other courts now use this rule when deciding similar maritime asbestos warning cases.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

Under maritime law, an equipment maker may have to warn about asbestos risks from later-added parts if its own product depended on those parts and made the danger foreseeable.

Impact

The decision affects maritime asbestos lawsuits against equipment makers, even when they did not make or sell the asbestos-containing part itself. For example, sailors or shipyard workers may still sue if a pump or boiler required asbestos parts to work and the danger was not obvious.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents