Skip to main content

No. 18-483October Term 2018Decided May 28, 2019

Docket 18-483October Term 2018 (2018–2019)

Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., et al.

The prompt shows that Indiana could enforce its fetal-remains disposal rule, but it does not supply full decision details for the rest of the case.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 28, 2019
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 28, 2019
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Question presented

1. Whether the court of appeals’ holding that Indiana’s requirements for the disposal of embryonic and fetal tissue fails rational basis review under the Due Process Clause warrants this Court’s review, where there is no meaningful circuit conflict, where a decision by this Court would provide no guidance to the lower courts currently considering more expansive challenges to similar statutes, and where the court of appeals properly applied well-established legal principles in concluding that Indiana’s statutory scheme does not rationally further its asserted interest. 2. Whether the court of appeals’ decision striking down a prohibition on a woman obtaining a pre-viability abortion where Indiana disapproves of her reason for doing so warrants review by this Court, where there is no conflict or even any other decision on the issue among courts of appeals and where the court below applied settled precedent from this Court that bars states from prohibiting women from terminating a pregnancy before viability.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released May 28, 2019

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

This case involved two Indiana abortion-related laws: one on how health care facilities must dispose of embryonic and fetal tissue, and another on abortions sought because of race, sex, or disability. Based on the prompt's research context, the Court said a state may require health care facilities to dispose of fetal remains as Indiana directed, but the prompt does not clearly provide a merits resolution of the separate reason-based abortion question.

Vote

The case is marked decided, and the prompt says certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) was granted, but it does not provide a vote count, opinion lineup, or oral-argument details.

Impact

The case affects abortion providers, hospitals, and patients in Indiana because it concerns what rules clinics must follow after an abortion procedure. For example, a clinic may have to change how it handles fetal remains to comply with state law.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action. Any further fights over Indiana's abortion laws would have to come through later cases or follow-up litigation.

What was the main dispute in this case?

Indiana defended one law on fetal-remains disposal and another involving abortions sought because of race, sex, or disability. Planned Parenthood challenged both laws.

Who could feel the effects of this case right away?

Abortion providers and hospitals in Indiana could be affected first. Patients could also see changes in how clinics handle procedures and follow state rules.

What happens procedurally after this Supreme Court action?

This Supreme Court docket action is over. Any new challenge would need to arise in later litigation or a different case.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The prompt shows that Indiana could enforce its fetal-remains disposal rule, but it does not supply full decision details for the rest of the case.

Impact

The case affects abortion providers, hospitals, and patients in Indiana because it concerns what rules clinics must follow after an abortion procedure. For example, a clinic may have to change how it handles fetal remains to comply with state law.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents