Arrests for criticizing police
Nieves v. Bartlett
In brief
The Court ruled against Bartlett because the troopers had legal grounds to arrest him, and it overturned the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 6-3 · May 28, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Thomas
- What it’s about
- Probable cause usually defeats a claim that police arrested someone for protected speech, except when similar people who were not speaking were not arrested.
- Who it affects
- Bartlett’s claim that the troopers arrested him to punish his speech failed because the Court found legal grounds for his arrest.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Court found probable cause for Russell Bartlett’s arrest, rejected his claim, overturned the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).
Two Alaska troopers arrested Russell Bartlett at the 2014 Arctic Man Festival for harassing one of them. Bartlett alleged that the real reason was his speech to the troopers.
The case asked whether an arrest supported by probable cause can still be challenged as punishment for speech protected by the First Amendment.
Question presented
Does probable cause defeat a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
What the Court decided
Holding
Because there was probable cause to arrest Bartlett, his retaliatory arrest claim fails as a matter of law. 613, reversed and remanded.
- Result
- Reversed
The Court's reasoning
The Court said probable cause—a reasonable basis to arrest—meant Bartlett’s claim that the arrest punished his speech failed as a matter of law.
The vote
- Joined the judgment
- Dissented
- Wrote an opinion
- Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
From the opinions
“There is no basis in §1983 or in the Constitution to withhold a remedy for an arrest that violated the First Amendment solely because the officer could point to probable cause that some offense, no matter how trivial or obviously pretextual, has occurred.”
What's next
The case goes back to the Ninth Circuit after the Supreme Court sent it back.
Each side's argument
- Russell Bartlett
- Bartlett alleged the troopers arrested him to punish speech protected by the First Amendment, not because he harassed an officer.
- The Alaska troopers
- The troopers argued that probable cause to arrest Bartlett shielded them from liability.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 4 moreShow fewer
Opinion added: Nieves
Opinion added: opinion
Brief added: Petition
Brief added: Questions Presented
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.