The full docket
The full docket
1-48 of 48+ cases
Docket
24-1287The Supreme Court held 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs on imports....
Docket
24-1021The Supreme Court unanimously held that NJ Transit Corporation is not an arm of New Jersey and therefore is not entitled to share in the state's sover...
Docket
24-351The Supreme Court held that the Federal Tort Claims Act's postal exception covers suits against the United States for the intentional nondelivery of m...
Docket
25-7026Whether petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability in the lower courts on his second collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. 2255, when he wa...
Docket
25-71651. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C), which criminalizes killing a person with intent to prevent them from telling authorities about a federal crime, ...
Docket
25-459The Court will consider whether the Video Privacy Protection Act, a 1988 law originally enacted to protect videotape rental records, applies to modern...
Docket
24-1159The Supreme Court vacated the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for further consideration regarding whether the denial of face-to-face conf...
Docket
25-52This case involves a factual dispute over whether an individual named Sweeney could have been the shooter in an incident based on his location and the...
Docket
25-180The Court unanimously reversed and remanded in a 9-0 per curiam decision. The case involved a Louisiana state statute and was decided without oral arg...
Docket
24-5438The Court vacated and remanded a case involving federal sentencing guidelines. The 5-4 decision, authored by Justice Sotomayor, addressed how courts s...
Docket
24-568The Supreme Court held 7-2 that a candidate for office has standing to challenge election rules governing the counting of votes. Chief Justice Roberts...
Docket
24-624The Court unanimously affirmed the Montana Supreme Court's decision in a 9-0 ruling authored by Justice Kagan. The case addressed state court jurisdic...
Docket
24-5774The Supreme Court unanimously held that Congress did not authorize convictions under both 18 U.S.C. §§924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j) for a single act that vi...
Docket
24-808The Court unanimously affirmed a Sixth Circuit decision in a 9-0 ruling authored by Justice Alito. The case addressed business law and contractual obl...
Docket
24-482The Court unanimously reversed and remanded an Eighth Circuit decision. Justice Kavanaugh authored the 9-0 opinion addressing federal criminal law que...
Docket
24-440The Court unanimously reversed and remanded a Third Circuit decision. Justice Barrett authored the 9-0 opinion addressing procedural requirements in f...
Docket
25-51The Court reversed and remanded in an 8-1 per curiam decision. The case was decided without oral argument.
Docket
24-1287The Supreme Court held 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs on imports....
Docket
24-351The Supreme Court held that the Federal Tort Claims Act's postal exception covers suits against the United States for the intentional nondelivery of m...
Docket
24-724The Supreme Court unanimously held that a district court's erroneous dismissal of a non-diverse party before final judgment cannot cure a jurisdiction...
Docket
24-758The Supreme Court held that a private company operating an immigration detention facility cannot take an immediate appeal from an order denying its de...
Docket
24-557The Supreme Court unanimously held that a trial court's qualified conferral order prohibiting discussion of a defendant's testimony during a mid-testi...
Docket
25A810This case involves a challenge by teachers and parents to a California state policy requiring schools to use students' preferred names and pronouns re...
Docket
24-1021The Supreme Court unanimously held that NJ Transit Corporation is not an arm of New Jersey and therefore is not entitled to share in the state's sover...
Docket
24-777The Supreme Court unanimously held that courts of appeals must apply substantial-evidence review to the Board of Immigration Appeals' determination of...
Docket
24-993The Court is considering a civil rights case about qualified immunity for law enforcement officers. The case addresses the standard courts use to eval...
Docket
25-297The Court held that a Vermont state police sergeant was entitled to qualified immunity after using a wristlock to remove a protester who refused to le...
Docket
24-171Can an internet service provider be held liable, and found to have acted willfully, for copyright infringement just because it knew users were infring...
Docket
24-1056Does the fugitive-tolling doctrine apply in the context of supervised release?
Docket
24-539Does a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy”—i.e., attempts to “convert” someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity—violate the Free Speech C...
Docket
24-813Oil companies challenge Louisiana parishes' lawsuits seeking damages for environmental harm caused by oil and gas operations. The case addresses wheth...
Docket
24-924The Court is considering a dispute over employee benefits and ERISA requirements. The case examines whether a corporation properly administered its em...
Docket
24-783Michigan sued Enbridge in state court to stop operation of its Line 5 pipeline, but Enbridge did not try to move the case to federal court until long ...
Docket
24-109The Court decided Louisiana v. Callais on April 29, 2026, affirming and remanding a ruling that struck down Louisiana's SB8 congressional map as an un...
Docket
24-781Faith-based pregnancy centers challenge a New Jersey attorney general's investigation and subpoena for donor information. The case raises First Amendm...
Docket
25-83After Adrian Jules sued his former employer and related parties in federal court, the case was sent to arbitration and stayed. The Supreme Court is re...
Docket
24-1238After Shawn Montgomery was seriously injured in a highway crash involving a truck hired to carry a shipment, he sued the freight broker that chose the...
Docket
24-983Cuban property owners seek damages from cruise lines that use property confiscated by the Cuban government, under the Helms-Burton Act. The case tests...
Docket
23-1209The Court is considering a dispute under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act about withdrawal liability. The case addresses how pension fund...
Docket
24-872The Court is deciding how to assess intellectual disability claims in death penalty cases when a defendant has taken multiple IQ tests with varying re...
Docket
24-935Are workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce—but who do not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles ...
Docket
24-7351Did the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably decide—under the standards set by federal habeas law—that Terry Pitchford gave up his right to argue th...
Docket
24-556The Court is considering a federal criminal law question about the scope of a federal statute and its application to the defendant's conduct.
Docket
24-820The Court is considering a federal criminal sentencing question about how courts should calculate the applicable guidelines range when multiple convic...
Docket
25-580The question presented is whether the Eleventh Circuit was correct that the Florida Supreme Court’s finding of overwhelming evidence against petitione...
Docket
25-406Are provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeiture...
Docket
25-466May the SEC seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm?
Docket
24-8891. When a generic drug manufacturer excludes a patented use from its label, can it still be liable for inducing infringement if it calls its product a...
Docket
25-5146Is venue proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur the...
Docket
24-345Does Section 47(b) of the ICA, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-46 (b), create an implied private right of action?
Docket
25-6May the doctrine of judicial estoppel be invoked to bar a plaintiff who fails to disclose a civil claim in bankruptcy filings from pursuing that claim...