Front page

Today at the Court

Arguments, opinions, and docket moves — all source-backed.

October Term 2025Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Lead caseDecidedNo. 24-1287Opinion Feb 20

Learning Resources v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States

The Supreme Court held 6-3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs on imports. Consolidated with Trump v. V.O.S. Se...

Editorial illustration for Learning Resources v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States

Docket: 24-1287
Status: Decided
Timeline: Opinion Feb 20
Brief: Detailed

Issue: Trade Law
Lower court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Question: Does the International Emergency Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 (“IEEPA”), authorize the president to impose tariffs?

Editorial illustration for Galette v. New Jersey Transit

DecidedNo. 24-1021

Galette v. New Jersey Transit

Opinion Mar 4Open

Editorial illustration for United States Postal Service v. Konan

DecidedNo. 24-351

United States Postal Service v. Konan

Opinion Feb 24Open

25-7026Corey Duran Berry v. United StatesJuly 14, 202625-7165Montgomery v. United StatesJuly 14, 202625-459Salazar v. Paramount Global, dba 247SportsJuly 14, 202624-1159Jeffrey Clyde Pitts v. MississippiJuly 14, 202625-52Transportation v. United StatesJuly 14, 2026

25-7026Corey Duran Berry v. United StatesJuly 14, 202625-7165Montgomery v. United StatesJuly 14, 202625-459Salazar v. Paramount Global, dba 247SportsJuly 14, 202624-1159Jeffrey Clyde Pitts v. MississippiJuly 14, 202625-52Transportation v. United StatesJuly 14, 2026

Case lanes

More from the docket

Recent opinions

Illustration for Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Barbara, et al.

DecidedNo. 25-365Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. BarbaraThis case asked whether President Trump’s Executive Order 14160 could deny birthright citizenship to children born in the United States when their parents were in the country unlawfully or only temporarily. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court and held that the Fourteenth Amendment and 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a) guarantee citizenship to those children, so the order is invalid on its face.Opinion Jun 30

Illustration for West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather Jackson

DecidedNo. 24-43Virginia v. B. P. J., By Her Next Friend and Mother, Heather JacksonA 14-year-old transgender girl seeks to compete on her school's girls' sports teams despite West Virginia's ban on transgender athletes in girls' sports. The case tests whether state laws restricting sports participation based on sex assigned at birth violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX.Opinion Jun 30

Illustration for Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.

DecidedNo. 24-38Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho v. HecoxA transgender woman challenges Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, which prohibits transgender girls and women from participating on female sports teams at public schools and universities. The case, brought by Lindsay Hecox who wanted to compete on Boise State's women's cross-country team, tests whether such bans violate the Equal Protection Clause.Opinion Jun 30

Illustration for Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State, Petitioner v. Republican National Committee, et al.

DecidedNo. 24-1260Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State v. Republican National CommitteeDo the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots that are cast by federal election day to be received by election officials after that day?Opinion Jun 29

Awaiting decision

No current cases.

Current term

Illustration for Corey Duran Berry, Petitioner v. United States

Before ArgumentsNo. 25-7026Corey Duran Berry v. United StatesWhether petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability in the lower courts on his second collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. 2255, when he was unable to obtain relief under controlling law due to his inability to show that it was more likely than not that he was convicted under the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. 924(c), which was invalidated in United States v. Davis, 588 U.S. 445 (2019), as opposed to Section 924(c)’s still-valid elements clause?Updated Jul 14

Illustration for Price Montgomery, Petitioner v. United States

Before ArgumentsNo. 25-7165Montgomery v. United States1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C), which criminalizes killing a person with intent to prevent them from telling authorities about a federal crime, necessarily involves murder, as the Third Circuit found, or whether it can also be committed through manslaughter, as the statute explicitly contemplates. 2. Even if § 1512(a)(1)(C) necessarily involves murder, whether charging and convicting someone of second-degree murder—which carries no mandatory minimum—but then sentencing them for first-degree murder—which carries mandatory life imprisonment—violates Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013). 3. Whether a state or local jurisdiction’s chief prosecutor may delegate authority to apply for wiretaps under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. (Incorporated from petition for a writ of certiorari in James Perrin v. United States, No. 25A935, permanent case number pending)?Updated Jul 14

Illustration for Michael Salazar, Petitioner v. Paramount Global, dba 247Sports

Before ArgumentsNo. 25-459Salazar v. Paramount Global, dba 247SportsThe Court will consider whether the Video Privacy Protection Act, a 1988 law originally enacted to protect videotape rental records, applies to modern streaming services and their collection of viewer data. The case tests whether someone must be a subscriber to audiovisual content specifically to have standing under the Act.Updated Jul 14

Illustration for Jeffrey Clyde Pitts, Petitioner v. Mississippi

DecidedNo. 24-1159Jeffrey Clyde Pitts v. MississippiThe Supreme Court vacated the lower court's judgment and remanded the case for further consideration regarding whether the denial of face-to-face confrontation rights can be considered harmless error.Opinion Nov 24

Term snapshot

OT 2025

Live counts

Ready case files

1296

Briefed across all terms.

Current term

561

OT 2025 active docket.

Pre-argument

122

Queued for argument.

Recent opinions

81

Holdings and source links.