Skip to main content

Kisor v. Wilkie

Updated Sep 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court wiped out the Federal Circuit’s ruling and sent Kisor’s case back to that court (vacated and remanded); the benefits dispute remains unresolved.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 26, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Kagan

What it’s about
Marine veteran James Kisor sought retroactive disability benefits for service-related PTSD after the Department of Veterans Affairs refused to pay them under its reading of a benefits regulation.
Who it affects
The Federal Circuit’s earlier ruling no longer stands: the Supreme Court wiped it out (vacated it) and sent the case back to that court (remanded it). Kisor’s request for an earlier benefits start date remains unresolved.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Kisor v. Wilkie
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court left Auer and Seminole Rock in place, but wiped out the Federal Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back (vacated and remanded) to reconsider the regulation’s meaning.

It fits a broader debate over the Auer/Seminole Rock rule, which lets courts give agencies extra weight when they interpret their own unclear regulations.

Question presented

1. Whether the Court should overrule Auer and Seminole Rock. 2. Alternatively, whether Auer deference should yield to a substantive canon of construction.

What the Court decided

Holding

The judgment is vacated and remanded. 869 F. 3d 1360, vacated and remanded.

Result
Vacated

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kaganwrote the opinion
  3. Ginsburg
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Robertsalso wrote separately
Concurring · 4agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Thomas
  2. Kavanaughwrote separately
  3. Gorsuchwrote separately
  4. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment (4 writing separately).

What's next

The Federal Circuit will handle the next proceedings after the Supreme Court sent the case back (remanded it). The final answer about Kisor’s earlier benefits start date remains for those proceedings.

Documents

4

Docket activity

12
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Jul 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jun 26, 2019 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 29, 2018 · Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Apr 19, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What was Kisor v. Wilkie about?
Vietnam veteran James Kisor sought an earlier disability-benefit start date after lower courts gave the VA’s reading extra weight. It also asked whether courts should keep using the Auer/Seminole Rock rule or use another rule for unclear regulations.
What did the Supreme Court do in Kisor?
It wiped out the Federal Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back to that court (vacated and remanded). The action did not end the benefits dispute.
Did the Court decide whether Kisor gets earlier benefits?
No final benefits result was stated. The case went back to the Federal Circuit for further proceedings after the Supreme Court wiped out its ruling (vacated it).
What happens next after Kisor v. Wilkie?
The Federal Circuit will continue the case after the Supreme Court sent it back (remanded it). Kisor’s request for an earlier benefits start date remains unresolved.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis