Reporting discrimination before suing
Fort Bend County v. Davis
In brief
The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the appeals court, ruling that the charge-filing step does not by itself take away a federal court’s power to hear a Title VII claim.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 9-0 · June 3, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg
- What it’s about
- Lois Davis’s Title VII religion-discrimination claim did not meet the required charge-filing step, and the dispute was whether that barred a federal court from hearing her claim.
- Who it affects
- For Davis’s claim, the missed filing step did not itself remove the federal court’s power to hear it; the employer can waive an objection to the requirement.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The Supreme Court unanimously agreed with the appeals court (affirmed) that the filing step is a procedural rule the employer can give up, not a limit on a federal court’s authority to hear the claim.
Title VII requires workers to complete an administrative charge-filing step for workplace discrimination claims.
Question presented
Whether Title VII's administrative exhaustion requirement is a jurisdictional?
What the Court decided
Holding
Title VII’s charge-filing requirement is not jurisdictional. Pp. 5– 11. 893 F. 3d 300, affirmed.
- Result
- Affirmed
The Court's reasoning
The Court said the charge-filing step governs how a claim is handled, not a federal court’s power to hear it. The employer can waive (give up) an objection to that step.
The vote
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished its review, and the Fifth Circuit’s ruling remains in place.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 4 moreShow fewer
Opinion added: Davis
Opinion added: opinion
Brief added: Petition
Brief added: Questions Presented
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.