Argument calendar
Argument calendar
1-48 of 230 cases
Docket
25-9661. Whether Article III of the Constitution precludes the Department of Labor from adjudicating proceedings to collect monetary remedies from employers...
Docket
25-417Whether the Ninth Circuit here erred in recognizing a Bivens cause of action.
Docket
25-159In private condemnations under the Natural Gas Act, should just compensation be determined by reference to state law?
Docket
25-1003Whether a claim relies on a "a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previousl...
Docket
25-352Where a defendant has filed an answer without pleading an affirmative defense, may the defendant nonetheless assert that affirmative defense as the ba...
Docket
25-59301. The question for this Court is whether disputes regarding the calculation of an inmate's earned First Step Act time credits, enabling the inmate to...
Docket
25-459Does the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer,” refer ...
Docket
25-5791. Whether the federal government's submission to a state or territorial regulator of an application to renew a RCRA permit is "final agency action" t...
Docket
25-498Whether, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, pleading that an ERISA fiduciary failed to use the requisite "care, skill, prudence, or dilig...
Docket
25-735Whether the district court had jurisdiction over petitioner’s constitutional challenge to the reduction of his veteran’s benefits, notwithstanding the...
Docket
25-170from the Supreme Court of Colorado.
Docket
25-11701. Is the United States’ promise to provide the Winnemucca Indian Colony, a federally recognized Tribe with lands held in trust established by an Exec...
Docket
25-1187from the Court of Appeals of New York.
Docket
25-13871. Whether the Federal Circuit’s standard for recovery of lost profits damages violates 35 U.S.C. § 284. 2. Whether Rule 702 requires courts to exclu...
Docket
25-74621. May a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, which is based exclusively on a false statement allegedly made in New Jersey to an agent physically prese...
Docket
25-7623Is the 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) requirement that “[a] second or successive motion must be certified . . . by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals” a...
Docket
25-14261. Whether the Fifth Amendment exempts intangible property from the per se rules that govern takings of tangible property. 2. Whether Puerto Rico enj...
Docket
25-7671Whether a criminal defendant is legally entitled to a Certificate of Appealability where: (1) It is demonstrated that a substantial showing of the den...
Docket
25-7635from the Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
Docket
25-7662Whether probable cause may be based solely on a handler’s interpretation of a drug-detection dog’s subtle behavioral changes when the dog fails to per...
Docket
25-1240Whether private instruction in courses required for state licensure constitutes government speech.
Docket
25-76141. Whether the Supremacy Clause and federal preemption principles are violated when a state utility commission mandates the installation of an advance...
Docket
25-1142Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the district court’s conclusion, after a bench trial, that four claims administration agreements did n...
Docket
25-1366Under §2 of the Twenty-first Amendment, may a State restrict out-of-state retailers from directly shipping alcohol to in-state consumers and may it ca...
Docket
25-7665Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)’s categorical ban on the possession of firearms unconstitutional as applied to a non-violent defendant, who indisputably poss...
Docket
25-14211. Whether the judgment below should be vacated in light of Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, 608 U. S. ___ (2026), where the California courts ...
Docket
25-14241. Whether Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated when FBI Special Agent Kathryn Graham testified as a summary witness by su...
Docket
25-1273This case asks when, if ever, the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause allows a prosecution witness in a criminal trial to testify by two-way video ...
Docket
25-7651Whether an appeal waiver, that waives “the right to appeal the . . . sentence on any ground, including . . . term of supervision and conditions,” bars...
Docket
25-11991. Whether, as this Court suggested in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), the existence of a circuit split alone, notwithstanding contrary h...
Docket
25-13771. Whether a state-court judgment rests on an adequate and independent state-law standing ground barring review under 28 U.S.C. § 1257 when the court ...
Docket
25-1356Whether absolute judicial immunity bars a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a state trial judge who personally directs and supervises police officers in...
Docket
25-73451. Can appellate courts summarily deny mandamus without addressing documented "bad faith ” , “ flagrant constitutional violations ” and judicial bias?...
Docket
25-1238Whether Libretti should be overruled.
Docket
25-153from the Supreme Court of Washington.
Docket
25-13701. Did the Supreme court of California in error, abuse discretion and show bias denying Petition (S293171) on Dec 10 25 and left unresolved conflicted...
Docket
25-7141Whether the “intelligible principle” test remains the appropriate standard for evaluating delegations of legislative power when the resulting regulati...
Docket
25-13471. Whether a court applying the Fourth Amendment’s totality-of-the-circumstances framework to a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 242 may effectively conf...
Docket
25-14291. Whether a district court violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by permitting retained counsel to withdraw post-trial without asses...
Docket
25-7515Whether the Ninth Circuit’s “prophylactic” “bright-line rule” that precludes a defendant’s use of investor behavior evidence to prevent “victim blamin...
Docket
25-14221. Whether this Court should, at minimum, grant, vacate, and remand in light of AT&T and the government’s concessions in that case. 2. Whether “locat...
Docket
25-7461Whether venue is proper in a district court where the offense conduct touching the district was not reasonably foreseeable to the defendant and not in...
Docket
25-7683THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY SENTENCING MR. HAHN EXCESSIVELY BASED ON THE STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS IN 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)?
Docket
25-1431from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Docket
25-7676Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)’s lifetime ban on firearm possession for all individuals previously convicted of a felony violates the Second Amendment,...
Docket
25-75701. Whether defendant was denied a fair trial where the State made numerous improper comments during its closing and rebuttal arguments? 2. Whether de...
Docket
25-1219Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), the federal statute that prohibits the possession of a firearm by a person who has been convicted of a crime punishable b...
Docket
25-67951. Whether a federal court may apply judicial estoppel to dismiss a civil action when the debtor reopened the bankruptcy case, amended the schedules w...