Skip to main content

When truckers can avoid arbitration

New Prime v. Oliveira

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

Oliveira won: the Court ruled that his contract with New Prime was covered by the FAA’s exemption for work agreements.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 8-0 · January 15, 2019 · Opinion by Justice Gorsuch

What it’s about
New Prime and truck driver Dominic Oliveira disputed whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s exemption for certain work contracts covered Oliveira’s independent-contractor agreement.
Who it affects
The FAA’s arbitration rules do not apply to Oliveira’s agreement with New Prime under this exemption.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that “contracts of employment” includes any agreement to perform work, so Oliveira’s agreement fell within the exemption, and agreed with the First Circuit (affirmed).

The dispute turned on whether the FAA’s phrase “contracts of employment” includes independent contractors’ work agreements.

Question presented

1. Whether a dispute over applicability of the FAA's Section 1 exemption is an arbitrability issue that must be resolved in arbitration pursuant to a valid delegation clause. 2. Whether the FAA's Section 1 exemption, which applies on its face only to "contracts of employment," is inapplicable to independent contractor agreements.

What the Court decided

Holding

Because the Act’s term “contract of employment” refers to any agreement to perform work, Mr. Oliveira’s agreement with New Prime falls within §1’s exception. 857 F. 3d 7, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The Court's reasoning

The Court read the Federal Arbitration Act’s Section 1 phrase “contract of employment” to include any agreement to perform work. It therefore found Oliveira’s agreement covered by the exemption.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Roberts
  6. Gorsuchwrote the opinion
  7. Alito
Concurring · 1agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Ginsburgwrote separately
8 justices joined the judgment (1 writing separately).

What's next

The Supreme Court’s review is complete, and the First Circuit’s ruling remains in place.

Documents

2

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jan 15, 2019 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis