Skip to main content

No. 17-647October Term 2018Decided Jun 21, 2019

Docket 17-647October Term 2018 (2018–2019)

Knick v. Township of Scott

The Court resolved an important fight over the timing and forum for federal takings claims.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 21, 2019
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 21, 2019
What it's about

This case arose after a Pennsylvania township required public daytime access to cemeteries on private land, and a landowner argued that the ordinance took her property without just compensation. The Supreme Court used the case to decide whether property owners must first seek compensation in state court before bringing a federal takings claim under the Fifth Amendment.

Question presented

1. Whether the Court should reconsider the portion of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 194-96 (1985), requiring property owners to exhaust state court remedies to ripen federal takings claims, as suggested by Justices of this Court? See Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC V. Town of Durham, 136 S. Ct. 1409 (2016) (Thomas, J., joined by Kennedy, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 348 (2005) (Rehnquist, C.J., joined by O'Connor, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., concurring in judgment). 2. Alternately, whether Williamson County's ripeness doctrine bars review of takings claims asserting that a law causes an unconstitutional taking on its face as the Sixth, Ninth, Tenth and now Third Circuits hold, or whether facial claims are exempt from Williamson County, as the First, Fourth, and Seventh Circuits hold?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jun 21, 2019

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

Knick v. Township of Scott grew out of a Pennsylvania ordinance requiring public daytime access to cemeteries on private land. The Supreme Court decided when a property owner may bring a federal takings claim under the Fifth Amendment after arguing that such a rule took property without just compensation.

Vote

The case was argued on January 16, 2019, and decided on June 21, 2019, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.

Impact

The case affects whether property owners must first go to state court before suing in federal court over an alleged taking. That matters for people like homeowners or farmers challenging local land-use rules they say force access to or use of private property.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this case. Its decision now guides lower courts, property owners, and local governments in future takings disputes.

What was the core dispute in Knick v. Township of Scott?

The case asked whether a landowner had to seek compensation in state court first before bringing a federal takings claim. It arose from a township rule requiring daytime public access to cemeteries on private land.

Why could this case matter in the real world?

It affects where and when property owners can challenge local rules they say take private property without compensation. That can shape disputes involving homes, farms, and other private land.

What is the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's decision?

The Court's work on this case is over. Lower courts and local governments now have to apply the decision in similar property-rights cases.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court resolved an important fight over the timing and forum for federal takings claims.

Impact

The case affects whether property owners must first go to state court before suing in federal court over an alleged taking. That matters for people like homeowners or farmers challenging local land-use rules they say force access to or use of private property.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents