No. 17-647October Term 2018Decided Jun 21, 2019
Knick v. Township of Scott
The Court resolved an important fight over the timing and forum for federal takings claims.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 21, 2019
- What it's about
This case arose after a Pennsylvania township required public daytime access to cemeteries on private land, and a landowner argued that the ordinance took her property without just compensation. The Supreme Court used the case to decide whether property owners must first seek compensation in state court before bringing a federal takings claim under the Fifth Amendment.
Question presented
1. Whether the Court should reconsider the portion of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 194-96 (1985), requiring property owners to exhaust state court remedies to ripen federal takings claims, as suggested by Justices of this Court? See Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC V. Town of Durham, 136 S. Ct. 1409 (2016) (Thomas, J., joined by Kennedy, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 348 (2005) (Rehnquist, C.J., joined by O'Connor, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., concurring in judgment). 2. Alternately, whether Williamson County's ripeness doctrine bars review of takings claims asserting that a law causes an unconstitutional taking on its face as the Sixth, Ninth, Tenth and now Third Circuits hold, or whether facial claims are exempt from Williamson County, as the First, Fourth, and Seventh Circuits hold?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jun 21, 2019
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
Knick v. Township of Scott grew out of a Pennsylvania ordinance requiring public daytime access to cemeteries on private land. The Supreme Court decided when a property owner may bring a federal takings claim under the Fifth Amendment after arguing that such a rule took property without just compensation.
Vote
The case was argued on January 16, 2019, and decided on June 21, 2019, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.
Impact
The case affects whether property owners must first go to state court before suing in federal court over an alleged taking. That matters for people like homeowners or farmers challenging local land-use rules they say force access to or use of private property.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished this case. Its decision now guides lower courts, property owners, and local governments in future takings disputes.
What was the core dispute in Knick v. Township of Scott?
The case asked whether a landowner had to seek compensation in state court first before bringing a federal takings claim. It arose from a township rule requiring daytime public access to cemeteries on private land.
Why could this case matter in the real world?
It affects where and when property owners can challenge local rules they say take private property without compensation. That can shape disputes involving homes, farms, and other private land.
What is the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's decision?
The Court's work on this case is over. Lower courts and local governments now have to apply the decision in similar property-rights cases.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court resolved an important fight over the timing and forum for federal takings claims.
Impact
The case affects whether property owners must first go to state court before suing in federal court over an alleged taking. That matters for people like homeowners or farmers challenging local land-use rules they say force access to or use of private property.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 17-647
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 3, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | May 24, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jun 21, 2019
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026