Voting record
How Samuel A. Alito, Jr. voted in the October Term 2018 (2018–2019)
Term at a glance
- Majority
- 34
- Concurrence
- 3
- Dissent
- 11
- Recusal
- 0
- Authored
- 13
Every tracked vote
DecidedLinda H. Lamone, et al., Appellants v. O. John Benisek, et al.DecidedVoteMajority18-726DecidedDepartment of Commerce v. New YorkDecidedVoteMajority18-966DecidedUnited States v. HaymondDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-1672DecidedKisor v. WilkieDecidedVoteMajority18-15DecidedTennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. ThomasDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored18-96DecidedDutra Group v. BattertonDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored18-266DecidedIancu v. BrunettiDecidedVoteConcurrenceAuthored18-302DecidedUnited States v. DavisDecidedVoteDissent18-431DecidedFood Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader MediaDecidedVoteMajority18-481DecidedKnick v. Township of ScottDecidedVoteMajority17-647DecidedRehaif v. United StatesDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-9560DecidedFlowers v. MississippiDecidedVoteConcurrenceAuthored17-9572DecidedNorth Carolina Dept. of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family TrustDecidedVoteConcurrenceAuthored18-457DecidedVirginia Uranium, Inc. v. WarrenDecidedVoteDissent16-1275DecidedManhattan Community Access Corp. v. HalleckDecidedVoteMajority17-1702DecidedGamble v. United StatesDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored17-646DecidedVirginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-HillDecidedVoteDissentAuthored18-281DecidedReturn Mail, Inc. v. Postal ServiceDecidedVoteMajority17-1594DecidedQuarles v. United StatesDecidedVoteMajority17-778DecidedParker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. NewtonDecidedVoteMajority18-389DecidedAlex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Allina Health Services, et al.DecidedVoteMajority17-1484DecidedMont v. United StatesDecidedVoteMajority17-8995DecidedTaggart v. LorenzenDecidedVoteMajority18-489DecidedSmith v. BerryhillDecidedVoteMajority17-1606DecidedKristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., et al.DecidedVoteMajority18-483DecidedMission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLCDecidedVoteMajority17-1657DecidedHerrera v. WyomingDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-532DecidedFranchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. HyattDecidedVoteMajority17-1299DecidedApple, Inc. v. PepperDecidedVoteDissent17-204DecidedCochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. HuntDecidedVoteMajority18-315DecidedGary Thacker, et ux., Petitioners v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDecidedVoteMajority17-1201DecidedLamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaDecidedVoteMajority17-988DecidedBiestek v. BerryhillDecidedVoteMajority17-1184DecidedBucklew v. PrecytheDecidedVoteMajority17-8151DecidedRepublic of Sudan v. HarrisonDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored16-1094DecidedSturgeon v. FrostDecidedVoteMajority17-949DecidedObduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLPDecidedVoteMajority17-1307DecidedFrank v. GaosDecidedVoteMajority17-961DecidedNielsen v. PreapDecidedVoteMajorityAuthored16-1363DecidedWashington State Dept. of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc.DecidedVoteDissent16-1498DecidedAir & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVriesDecidedVoteDissent17-1104DecidedFourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.comDecidedVoteMajority17-571DecidedJam v. International Finance Corp.DecidedVoteMajority17-1011DecidedGarza v. IdahoDecidedVoteDissent17-1026DecidedMadison v. AlabamaDecidedVoteDissentAuthored17-7505DecidedJim Yovino, Fresno County Superintendent of Schools, Petitioner v. Aileen RizoDecidedVoteMajority18-272DecidedTimbs v. IndianaDecidedVoteMajority17-1091DecidedDawson v. SteagerDecidedVoteMajority17-419
Agreement with other justices
| Justice | Agreement | Cases together |
|---|---|---|
| Clarence Thomas | 90% | 43 of 48 |
| John G. Roberts, Jr. | 90% | 43 of 48 |
| Brett M. Kavanaugh | 89% | 39 of 44 |
| Neil Gorsuch | 73% | 35 of 48 |
| Elena Kagan | 58% | 28 of 48 |
| Ruth Bader Ginsburg | 52% | 25 of 48 |
| Sonia Sotomayor | 52% | 25 of 48 |
| Stephen G. Breyer | 52% | 25 of 48 |
Methodology
Vote records come from Oyez and cover publicly tracked merits cases. Recusals are listed but excluded from agreement rates.
Two justices agree in a case when they land on the same side of the judgment: voting with the majority, including concurrences, or in dissent together. A case counts toward agreement rates only when at least 8 substantive votes are on record.