Skip to main content

Voting record

How Clarence Thomas voted in the October Term 2013 (2013–2014)

Associate Justice15 tracked case votes

Term at a glance

October Term 2013 (2013–2014)

Majority
5
Concurrence
5
Dissent
5
Recusal
0
Authored
5
  • Majority5
  • Concurrence5
  • Dissent5
  • Recused0
On the winning side of the judgment in 67% of 15 participating votes.

Every tracked vote

Religious objections to birth controlSylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Decided Vote Majority13-354Abortion clinic buffer zonesEleanor McCullen v. Martha Coakley, Attorney General of MassachusettsDecided Vote Concurrence12-1168Copyright for TV streamingAmerican Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., fka Bamboom Labs, Inc.Decided Vote Dissent13-461Stock fraud class actionsHalliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc.Decided Vote ConcurrenceAuthored13-317Bruce James Abramski, Jr. v. United StatesDecided Vote Dissent12-1493Children aging out of visasLori Scialabba, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services v. Rosalina Cuellar de OsorioDecided Vote Dissent12-930Federal power over local poisoningCarol Anne Bond v. United StatesDecided Vote ConcurrenceAuthored12-158Death penalty disability rulesFreddie Lee Hall v. FloridaDecided Vote Dissent12-10882Police shootings during car chasesOfficer Vance Plumhoff v. Whitne Rickard, a Minor Child, Individually, and as Surviving Daughter of Donald Rickard, By and Through Her Mother Samantha Rickard, as Parent and Next FriendDecided Vote Majority12-1117Tribal immunity from state lawsuitsMichigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunityDecided Vote DissentAuthored12-515Bill Schuette, Attorney General of Michigan v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)Decided Vote Concurrence12-682Traffic stops based on tipsLorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaDecided Vote MajorityAuthored12-9490Campaign donation limitsShaun McCutcheon v. Federal Election CommissionDecided Vote ConcurrenceAuthored12-536Who decides arbitration requirementsBG Group plc v. Republic of ArgentinaDecided Vote Majority12-138Immunity for security reportsAir Wisconsin Airlines Corporation v. William L. HoeperDecided Vote Majority12-315

Agreement with other justices

October Term 2013 (2013–2014)

Share of decided cases this term in which Justice Clarence Thomas voted on the same side of the judgment as each other justice
JusticeAgreementCases together
Samuel A. Alito, Jr.100%15 of 15
Antonin Scalia87%13 of 15
John G. Roberts, Jr.73%11 of 15
Anthony M. Kennedy60%9 of 15
Stephen G. Breyer60%9 of 15
Ruth Bader Ginsburg47%7 of 15
Sonia Sotomayor47%7 of 15
Elena Kagan43%6 of 14

Methodology

Two justices agree in a case when they land on the same side of the judgment: voting with the majority, including concurrences, or in dissent together.

Vote records come from Oyez. A case counts only when at least 8 substantive votes are on record, so partial data can understate coverage but a vote is never invented. Recusals are listed but left out of agreement rates.

Term statisticsHow this site is made