Skip to main content

Copyright for TV streaming

American Broadcasting Companies v. Aereo

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

Aereo lost on the public-performance question: the Court ruled that its transmissions counted as public performances under copyright law.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · June 25, 2014 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
The Supreme Court ruled that Aereo publicly performed the networks’ copyrighted programs when it sent them over the Internet to subscribers. It overturned the Second Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).
Who it affects
The Court ruled that Aereo’s transmissions of the networks’ copyrighted programs counted as public performances under federal copyright law.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., fka Bamboom Labs, Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Aereo's automatic system let subscribers select copyrighted network programs and receive them on Internet-connected devices. The networks sued, claiming Aereo violated their exclusive right to publicly perform their programs.

The case asked how copyright owners’ right to control public performances applies to programs sent over the internet.

Question presented

Does a company "publicly perform" a copyrighted television program when it transmits the program to paid subscribers over the Internet?

What the Court decided

Holding

Aereo performs petitioners’ works publicly within the meaning of the Transmit Clause. 712 F. 3d 676, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Kagan
  3. Kennedy
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Roberts
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Thomas
  2. Scaliawrote the dissent
  3. Alito
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

From the opinions

“That claim fails at the very outset because Aereo does not “perform” at all.”

— Justice Scalia(dissent)

What's next

The case returns to the Second Circuit for further proceedings.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Opinion added: Aereo

    Jun 25, 2014 · Court records

More questions

1
What did Justice Scalia criticize?
He argued that the Court ignored widely accepted rules for when service providers can be held responsible and instead used a cable-TV-like test that could cause confusion.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis