Skip to main content

Protected home equity in bankruptcy

Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court blocked the use of Law’s protected $75,000 to pay Siegel’s fees and sent the case back to the Ninth Circuit (remanded).

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · March 4, 2014 · Opinion by Justice Scalia

What it’s about
After finding that Stephen Law had acted fraudulently to keep the trustee from selling his home, the bankruptcy court ordered $75,000 protected by Law’s homestead exemption used to pay trustee Alfred Siegel’s attorney fees.
Who it affects
The $75,000 protected for Law’s home is not available for the fee payment ordered by the bankruptcy court.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Stephen Law v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court overturned the appeals court’s approval, ruling that bankruptcy courts cannot override the Bankruptcy Code’s homestead protection, and sent the case back to the Ninth Circuit (remanded).

The bankruptcy court found that Law had acted fraudulently by creating fictional liens to stop Siegel from selling Law’s home.

The dispute arose while trustee Alfred Siegel was trying to sell Law’s home in Law’s bankruptcy case.

Question presented

When a debtor creates fictional liens to prevent a trustee from selling a property, should a Bankruptcy Court allow a surcharge to extend to normally exempted homestead property?

What the Court decided

Holding

The Bankruptcy Court exceeded the limits of its authority when it ordered that the $75,000 protected by Law’s homestead exemption be made available to pay Siegel’s attorney’s fees. 697, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The Court's reasoning

The Court said the bankruptcy court exceeded its power by ordering that the $75,000 go toward Siegel’s attorney fees.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Scaliawrote the opinion
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburg
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Opinion added: Law

    Mar 4, 2014 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis