Skip to main content

Inherited IRAs in bankruptcy

Brandon C. Clark, et ux. v. Rameker

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Clarks could not use the retirement-savings exemption to protect Heidi’s inherited IRA in bankruptcy.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 12, 2014 · Opinion by Justice Sotomayor

What it’s about
The Supreme Court agreed with the Seventh Circuit that Brandon and Heidi Clark could not use the Bankruptcy Code’s protection for retirement savings to keep Heidi’s inherited IRA out of their bankruptcy estate.
Who it affects
The Clarks could not use the retirement-savings exemption to keep Heidi Clark’s inherited IRA out of their bankruptcy estate.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Brandon C. Clark, et ux. v. William J. Rameker, Trustee
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

It decided that inherited IRAs are not “retirement funds” covered by that protection.

Heidi Clark held the inherited account, and Brandon Clark was also involved in the bankruptcy case.

The Bankruptcy Code protects some retirement savings in bankruptcy; the dispute was whether that protection covered an inherited account.

Question presented

Does the U.S. Bankruptcy Code exempt an inherited IRA from a debtor's estate in bankruptcy?

What the Court decided

Holding

Funds held in inherited IRAs are not “retirement funds” within the meaning of §522(b)(3)(C). 714 F. 3d 559, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The Court's reasoning

The Court read “retirement funds” as money set aside for a person’s retirement. It concluded that funds in an inherited IRA did not fit that description.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburg
  7. Sotomayorwrote the opinion
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its review, leaving the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in place.

Documents

1

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Rameker

    Jun 12, 2014 · Court records

More questions

3
Which Bankruptcy Code provision did the Court interpret?
Section 522(b)(3)(C), the provision covering the retirement-fund exemption at issue.
Who was the trustee in the case?
William J. Rameker was the trustee named in the case.
Did the Court decide whether other types of accounts are exempt?
Its stated ruling concerns inherited IRAs; it does not state a ruling on other account types.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis