Skip to main content

Trespassing on military roads

United States v. John Dennis Apel

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Court said the law covers Vandenberg’s roads and protest area, wiped out the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, and sent the case back.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · February 26, 2014 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
Apel argued a road easement put Vandenberg’s protest area outside a law restricting access to military bases.
Who it affects
The federal access law covers Vandenberg’s highways and protest area because they are within the base commander’s area of responsibility.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for United States v. John Dennis Apel
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court ruled the law covers the base commander’s area, including its roads and protest area, wiped out the Ninth Circuit ruling and sent the case back (vacated and remanded); it did not decide the First Amendment question.

The dispute concerned 18 U.S.C. §1382, a federal law restricting access to military installations.

Question presented

Can a federal statute be enforced on a portion of a military installation that is subject to a public roadway easement?

What the Court decided

Holding

A “military... installation” for purposes of §1382 encompasses the commanding officer’s area of responsibility, and it includes Vandenberg’s highways and protest area. 676 F. 3d 1202, vacated and remanded.

Result
Vacated

The Court's reasoning

The Court read the law to cover the area under a base commander’s responsibility, including Vandenberg’s highways and protest area.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburgwrote the opinion
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Robertsalso wrote separately
  9. Alitoalso wrote separately
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case goes back to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings under the Supreme Court’s ruling. The Supreme Court did not decide the First Amendment question.

Documents

1

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Apel

    Feb 26, 2014 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis