Docket status
Docket status
145-192 of 230 cases
Docket
25-13771. Whether a state-court judgment rests on an adequate and independent state-law standing ground barring review under 28 U.S.C. § 1257 when the court ...
Docket
25-12621. Whether criminal statutes containing their own comprehensive enforcement provisions and penalties are, as in Section 1983, excluded from serving as...
Docket
25-11441. In Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited, 601 U.S. 416 (2024) (“CFPB”), this Court u...
Docket
25-1342The Question Presented is whether an automobile is per se an instrumentality of interstate commerce, which would make a federal offense of every kidna...
Docket
25-14301. Whether the Seventh Amendment permits the waiver of a jury trial through a standard lease provision without an explicit, voluntary, and knowing wai...
Docket
25-13851. Whether a proposed submarket must be rejected if evidence shows that some customers can shift their purchases to other channels, even if other evid...
Docket
25-238Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles.
Docket
25-75031. Does the Younger Doctrine violate the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution by denying citizens their Bill of Rights protections gua...
Docket
25-7583Whether due process is violated where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin filed a dispositive motion on September 10, 2025 that should have been grant...
Docket
25-76701. Whether a court may deny discovery on a selective enforcement claim where the defendant has presented evidence—more than mere speculation—of a raci...
Docket
25-1431from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Docket
25-13711. The Supreme Court of California should not have denied the Petition for Review, and the subject Order against EZOR should be reversed. 2. The Supr...
Docket
25-75701. Whether defendant was denied a fair trial where the State made numerous improper comments during its closing and rebuttal arguments? 2. Whether de...
Docket
25-14291. Whether a district court violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by permitting retained counsel to withdraw post-trial without asses...
Docket
25-76801. Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s "anomalous rule" for intervention appeals violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by dismissing prosp...
Docket
25-7665Is 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)’s categorical ban on the possession of firearms unconstitutional as applied to a non-violent defendant, who indisputably poss...
Docket
25-7437When a district court imposes a 224-month upward variance with no explanation beyond a rote recitation of statutory sentencing factors, and a court of...
Docket
25-13411. Whether a Fourteenth Amendment claim for deprivation of liberty without due process of law, founded on an allegation that a latent print analyst ca...
Docket
25-7608Whether Petitioner was deprived of his right, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged ...
Docket
25-1219Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1), the federal statute that prohibits the possession of a firearm by a person who has been convicted of a crime punishable b...
Docket
25-13031. Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection clauses permit the federal judiciary to require its employees to adjudicate sexual h...
Docket
25-7562What standard applies when appellate courts review a trial court’s dismissal of a juror during deliberations to determine whether the dismissal was ba...
Docket
25-1325Whether the Act’s delegation of law-enforcement and rulemaking power to the private Authority violates the Constitution’s private non-delegation doctr...
Docket
25-7499from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Docket
25-12461. Does 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(B)(i) impose a “reasonable attorney” or a “reasonable applicant” test for due diligence? If the former, are there excep...
Docket
25-1335Whether, consistent with the standard for mandamus relief, it is clear and indisputable that an accused has not begun performance under Rule 705(d)(4)...
Docket
25-13601. Whether respondents’ challenge to H.B. 71 is non-justiciable. 2. Whether H.B. 71 is facially unconstitutional under either the Establishment Claus...
Docket
25-7635from the Court of Appeals of Mississippi.
Docket
25-7547Can a Court Be Allowed To Ignore This Court's Instructions Set Forth In Haines v. Kerner? And If So, To What Degree?
Docket
25-73841. Whether, after Ruan v. United States, 597 U.S. 450 (2022), the Controlled Substances Act permits the Drug Enforcement Administration to revoke a ph...
Docket
25-7543Whether informational words may constitute adequate provocation for a heat of passion defense.
Docket
25-170from the Supreme Court of Colorado.
Docket
25-75301. Does 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violate the Second Amendment on its face or as applied to Petitioner? 2. Does 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) exceed Congress’s a...
Docket
25-1365Whether a defendant can rebut the inflation maintenance theory by showing that back-end disclosures didn’t actually correct its alleged misstatements,...
Docket
25-13761. Whether an issuer violates Section 11(a)’s misleading-omissions prong by describing unmaterialized risks as hypothetical. 2. Whether an issuer vio...
Docket
25-74621. May a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, which is based exclusively on a false statement allegedly made in New Jersey to an agent physically prese...
Docket
25-74731. Whether alternative remedies (such as the Bureau of Prisons’ Administrative Remedy Program) should be considered at “step one” or “step two” of the...
Docket
25-1348Whether the decision below conflicts with this Court’s clear, repeated admonitions that lower courts must define clearly established rights with speci...
Docket
25-13111. Whether a court may hold a party in civil contempt based on a violation of an injunction's "spirit" where the injunction is silent as to the conduc...
Docket
25-1390from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
Docket
25-7299Whether a court of appeals correctly applies Kisor when it finds a term "genuinely ambiguous" based on a multiplicity of dictionary definitions alone,...
Docket
25-1195Does the Texas continuous-sexual-abuse statute violate a defendant’s right to a unanimous verdict by the jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment...
Docket
25-1313Does the National Bank Act preempt the application of state interest-on-escrow laws to national banks?
Docket
25-12481. Whether the court of appeals correctly determined that New Mexico has an informational interest in requiring qualified donor disclosure for communi...
Docket
25-1123Under the statutory and regulatory notice requirements governing VA decisions since 1990, is the VA permitted to retroactively deem a claim “implicitl...
Docket
25-6623Whether Petitioner was derived of his right, under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged w...
Docket
25-71651. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C), which criminalizes killing a person with intent to prevent them from telling authorities about a federal crime, ...
Docket
25-5791. Whether the federal government's submission to a state or territorial regulator of an application to renew a RCRA permit is "final agency action" t...