Skip to main content

Civil contempt for injunction violations

Apple v. Epic Games

Updated Nov 2, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Argument Scheduled

Oral argument January 11, 2027

Decision expected by late June 2027

What it’s about
The Court will consider whether Apple could be held in civil contempt for conduct that allegedly violated the “spirit” of an injunction in its dispute with Epic Games, even though the injunction did not expressly prohibit that conduct.
What's at stake
The case could affect how clearly federal courts must write injunctions before penalizing a company for contempt.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Apple Inc. v. Epic Games, Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Question presented

Whether a court may hold a party in civil contempt based on a violation of an injunction's "spirit" where the injunction is silent as to the conduct upon which contempt is based, as the Ninth Circuit holds; or, instead, whether a court must ground a finding of civil contempt on the violation of an order that clearly and unambiguously proscribes the precise conduct at issue, as other circuits hold.

What happens next

Expected by late June 2027

Argument is on the calendar for January 11, 2027. Decisions typically follow within about 93 days of argument. Nearly all opinions are released before the term ends in late June or early July 2027.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.

Argument and decision days

Documents

3

Docket activity

29
  • Case data updated: title

    Nov 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: title

    Nov 2, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Nov 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Nov 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 21, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is at stake in Apple v. Epic Games?
The Court will decide whether civil contempt can rest on an injunction's “spirit” rather than conduct clearly barred by its text.
Who could be affected by Apple v. Epic Games?
Companies subject to federal injunctions could be affected by the clarity required before contempt penalties.
What happens next in Apple v. Epic Games?
The Court may schedule oral argument or make another scheduling move. No decision timing has been set.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis