Docket status
Docket status
1-48 of 230 cases
Docket
25-153from the Supreme Court of Washington.
Docket
25-72161. Can a court of appeals disregard the government’s deliberate waiver of whether a jury trial right violation is harmless in the enhanced statutory p...
Docket
25-6690DOES THE JUDICIAL IMMUNITY DOCTRINE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO PERMIT MALICIOUS AND CORRUPT JUDICIAL RULINGS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS ERRORS OF LAW OR MISAPPLICA...
Docket
25-72011. Whether a federal court violates Due Process Clause and the protections of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) when it denies a nonmovant’s r...
Docket
25-76541. Does a prosecutor commit structural error by advocating a harsher sentence because the defendant is a young woman who would otherwise be capable of...
Docket
25-75871. Was Petitioner denied meaningful effective assistance of Court appointed counsel (preliminary hearing, trial, direct appeal, and PCPA) to get and m...
Docket
25-1389Whether the principles of Hope v. Pelzer are limited to Eighth Amendment claims or extend to Free Speech and Free Exercise claims such that petitioner...
Docket
25-14221. Whether this Court should, at minimum, grant, vacate, and remand in light of AT&T and the government’s concessions in that case. 2. Whether “locat...
Docket
25-7515Whether the Ninth Circuit’s “prophylactic” “bright-line rule” that precludes a defendant’s use of investor behavior evidence to prevent “victim blamin...
Docket
25-1393This pending petition asks the Supreme Court to use its extraordinary authority to make sweeping changes to the Constitution and to the way federal an...
Docket
25-1405Whether a Police Officer's Oath of Office that is taken in accordance with Article VI of The United States Constitution, further protects the Officer'...
Docket
25-7677Whether, as the Eighth Circuit held, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (which prohibits any felon from possessing firearms) is invariably constitutional both faci...
Docket
25-840Whether parents have standing to challenge a law or policy that deliberately displaces their decision-making role as to "gender transitions" of their ...
Docket
25-7026Whether petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability in the lower courts on his second collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. 2255, when he wa...
Docket
25-75201. Whether a court may defeat a Title VII hostile work environment claim on summary judgment by parsing the record incident by incident instead of eva...
Docket
25-75501. In an interlocutory qualified immunity appeal, may a court of appeals uphold deadly force by relying on predictive theories and inferred risks not ...
Docket
25-1366Under §2 of the Twenty-first Amendment, may a State restrict out-of-state retailers from directly shipping alcohol to in-state consumers and may it ca...
Docket
25-14121. Whether Respondent’s multi-year possession, control and use of Petitioner’s property is a taking sufficient to trigger the payment of “just compens...
Docket
25-13471. Whether a court applying the Fourth Amendment’s totality-of-the-circumstances framework to a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 242 may effectively conf...
Docket
25-1350Whether the National Bank Act preempts state interest-on-escrow laws that, like California Civil Code § 2954.8(a), attempt to set the financial terms ...
Docket
25-71421. Did the Fifth Circuit clearly violate the party presentation principle by affirming Petitioner’s judgment based on a hypothetical finding of fact t...
Docket
25-75061. Whether the six-month statute of limitations for a duty-of-fair-representation claim under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., is subje...
Docket
25-11991. Whether, as this Court suggested in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), the existence of a circuit split alone, notwithstanding contrary h...
Docket
25-1398Did the Circuit Court’s holding that LT Mitchell was not promoted by operation of law, when he was retained on the promotion list longer than the 18 m...
Docket
25-7671Whether a criminal defendant is legally entitled to a Certificate of Appealability where: (1) It is demonstrated that a substantial showing of the den...
Docket
25-13381. Whether Officer Jonathan Granado’s use of deadly force on September 3, 2021 violated the Fourth Amendment when, after a high-speed chase, Estevan R...
Docket
25-7696Whether the Fifth Circuit properly reviewed the district court’s sentence when it wrote a two paragraph opinion affirming an upwardly varied sentence.
Docket
25-1425Did the trial judge’s refusal to instruct on the lack of mental responsibility defense violate petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right to due process?
Docket
25-73451. Can appellate courts summarily deny mandamus without addressing documented "bad faith ” , “ flagrant constitutional violations ” and judicial bias?...
Docket
25-76691. Whether district courts are required to conduct a Faretta inquiry when a defendant invokes his right to self-representation for a second time. 2. ...
Docket
25-14211. Whether the judgment below should be vacated in light of Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, 608 U. S. ___ (2026), where the California courts ...
Docket
25-71921. Whether the state court erred in upholding, contrary to U.S. v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998), and the Excessive Fines Clause, a mandatory fine p...
Docket
25-7259Whether the failure of an indictment to allege an essential element of a criminal offense constitutes structural error requiring automatic reversal, o...
Docket
25-13551. Whether the officers’ warrantless search of a backyard in close proximity to the domestic violence victim’s residence was a lawful “hot pursuit” wh...
Docket
25-7461Whether venue is proper in a district court where the offense conduct touching the district was not reasonably foreseeable to the defendant and not in...
Docket
25-1098The question is whether the ordinance, on its face, violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Docket
25-13951. Whether the systematic denial of Electronic Case Filing (ECF) access to pro se litigants violates the Equal Protection component of the Fifth Amend...
Docket
25-14231. Did the Agency violate the law by disregarding a judge ’ s order and release only one of two legal reviews to the Petitioner in a security clearanc...
Docket
25-1142Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the district court’s conclusion, after a bench trial, that four claims administration agreements did n...
Docket
25-1280Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, consistent with this Court’s precedents in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), ...
Docket
25-12301. Whether the PTO retains statutory authority to deny institution based on the “settled expectations” factor, where discretion is committed to the PT...
Docket
25-1351Whether, under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, a defendant bears any burden to demonstrate t...
Docket
25-10911. Given the Supreme Court’s decision in Monell, can a governmental entity be held liable, either under the doctrine of respondeat superior or the “no...
Docket
25-14241. Whether Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated when FBI Special Agent Kathryn Graham testified as a summary witness by su...
Docket
25-1383Whether federal common law or state law determines whether a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement governed by the Convention on the Recognition an...
Docket
25-76501. Whether the authority of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 serves the unknown class; enforceable c? by demonstration of no difference to protected class...
Docket
25-7660Under Chavez-Meza v. United States, 585 U.S. 109 (2018), can a district court ignore a party’s post-sentencing rehabilitation when deciding a sentence...
Docket
25-7623Is the 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) requirement that “[a] second or successive motion must be certified . . . by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals” a...