Antonio Goodwin, Petitioner v. AT&T Corporation

Whether due process is violated where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin filed a dispositive motion on September 10, 2025 that should have been granted in Plain tiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin ’ s favor, where the dispositive motion filed on September 10, 2025 proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin was an employee of AT&T, AT&T Inc., and AT&T Corp., where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin filed more than 1,053 documents identifying Antonio Goodwin on AT&T, AT&T Inc., and AT&T Corp, documents as an employee of those entities, where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin received an AT&T envelope dated January 17, 2022 containing his full name, employee number, AT&T password, clothing-order records, AT&T phone number 1-800-331-0500, and the att.com/returns website, where a live AT&T customer service agent confirmed in writing “ this is AT&T, ” where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin preserved those text messages, where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin has a video-recorded phone call message from AT&T stating “ this is AT&T ” from his employee document, where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin has a live agent texting?