Skip to main content

No. 25-7670October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-7670October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Keenon Green, Petitioner v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Question presented

1. Whether a court may deny discovery on a selective enforcement claim where the defendant has presented evidence—more than mere speculation—of a racially discriminatory pattern, on the ground that the showing is insufficiently comprehensive or representative. 2. Whether a court may deny discovery on a selective enforcement claim by treating a defendant’s initiation of contact with law enforcement as a factor weighing against discovery, notwithstanding that law enforcement retains discretion over whether and how to pursue the investigation.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

Keenon Green is asking the Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit case about discovery (access to evidence) for a selective enforcement claim (a claim that law enforcement targeted someone because of race). The petition says courts should not block discovery when a defendant shows more than speculation of a racial pattern, or because the defendant first contacted law enforcement even though officers still controlled how to pursue the investigation.

Argument

No argument is scheduled yet. The petition asks the Court to decide whether courts are setting the bar too high for discovery in selective enforcement cases, including in the Ninth Circuit.

Impact

The case could shape how hard it is for criminal defendants to get records and other evidence needed to test claims of racial bias in investigations. For example, a defendant who points to a pattern in similar cases may need discovery to try to prove that race played a role.

What is at stake in Keenon Green v. United States?

The case asks when a defendant can get discovery to support a claim of racially selective law enforcement. It also questions whether starting contact with police should count against discovery.

Who could be affected by Keenon Green v. United States?

Criminal defendants who claim investigators treated people differently because of race could be affected most. Law enforcement agencies could also face broader requests for records and data.

What happens next in Keenon Green v. United States?

The justices must decide whether to hear the case. If they take it, the next major step would be briefing and then oral argument.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 17, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3