Skip to main content

No. 25-7299October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-7299October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Ali Mif Bey, Petitioner v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Question presented

Whether a court of appeals correctly applies Kisor when it finds a term "genuinely ambiguous" based on a multiplicity of dictionary definitions alone, or by invoking the regulation's purpose to introduce rather than resolve ambiguity.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

This petition asks the Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit case about Kisor v. Wilkie, which limits when courts may accept an agency's reading of its own rule. The question is whether the lower court treated a term as "genuinely ambiguous" too easily by relying on multiple dictionary definitions or the rule's purpose.

Argument

No oral argument is scheduled. The petition says courts disagree over whether multiple dictionary definitions or a rule's purpose can make a regulation "genuinely ambiguous" under Kisor.

Impact

The answer could affect federal cases where judges must decide whether a rule is truly unclear before accepting an agency's view. That matters to people or businesses challenging how an agency reads its own regulations.

What is Ali Mif Bey v. United States about?

It asks whether the Fourth Circuit misused Kisor by calling a regulation term "genuinely ambiguous" too quickly. The petition says multiple dictionary meanings or rule purpose alone should not create ambiguity.

Who could be affected if the Court takes this case?

People, businesses, and agencies in federal rule disputes could be affected. The answer may shape when judges accept an agency's reading of its own regulation.

What happens next in Ali Mif Bey v. United States?

The justices must decide whether to grant certiorari (hear the case). No oral argument is scheduled, and no decision window is available yet.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 25, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3