Skip to main content

No. 25-7562October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-7562October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

James Curtis Kern, Petitioner v. California

from the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District.

Question presented

What standard applies when appellate courts review a trial court’s dismissal of a juror during deliberations to determine whether the dismissal was based on the juror’s views of the case and thus a violation of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury?

Case path

Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

James Curtis Kern has asked the Supreme Court to review a California case about how appeals courts should review a trial judge's decision to remove a juror after deliberations began. The question is whether the juror was dismissed because of the juror's views of the case, which could violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.

Argument

The case is at the petition stage, and no oral argument has been scheduled.

Impact

The answer could shape how hard it is for defendants to challenge convictions after a deliberating juror is removed. For example, a conviction could stand or be undone depending on how much deference an appeals court gives the trial judge.

What is James Curtis Kern v. California about?

It asks what review standard appeals courts should use when a trial judge removes a juror during deliberations. The concern is whether the juror was removed for the juror's view of the case.

Who could be affected if the Court takes Kern v. California?

Criminal defendants, jurors, trial judges, and appeals courts could all be affected. The rule could influence whether a conviction survives when a deliberating juror is dismissed.

What happens next in James Curtis Kern v. California?

The justices must decide whether to grant certiorari (agree to hear the case). No oral argument is scheduled yet, so watch for a scheduling order or another Court action.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 24, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3