Conflicting DNA evidence

1. Whether Petitioner ’ s conviction violates the Due Process Clause where DNA recovered from a sexual assault kit allegedly matched Petitioner ’ s later-obtained buccal swab at a statistical probability of one in a trillion, while the same evidentiary sample failed to match Petitioner ’ s preexisting DNA profile stored in CODIS. 2. Whether the prosecution violated Brady v. Maryland by suppressing a forensic report documenting the absence of a CODIS match and failing to disclose that report to the defense before trial. 3. Whether DNA evidence satisfies constitutional standards of reliability and sufficiency where contradictory forensic testing produced both a purportedly conclusive statistical match and an exclusion from the defendant ’ s CODIS profile. 4. Whether Petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington where trial counsel failed to lay the proper evidentiary foundation necessary to impeach a key prosecution witness.