Skip to main content

No. 24-38October Term 2025Decided Jun 30, 2026

Docket 24-38October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.

The Court has now answered a major constitutional question about transgender participation in school sports, and that answer will shape policies beyond Idaho.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 30, 2026
Case AcceptedJul 3, 2025
Arguments HeardJan 13, 2026
Decision ReleasedJun 30, 2026
What it's about

A transgender woman challenges Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, which prohibits transgender girls and women from participating on female sports teams at public schools and universities. The case, brought by Lindsay Hecox who wanted to compete on Boise State's women's cross-country team, tests whether such bans violate the Equal Protection Clause.

Question presented

May a state, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, categorically require sports participants to compete based on their biological sex, rather than gender identity?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jun 30, 2026

Area

Civil Rights

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court released a decision in the fight over Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, which bars transgender girls and women from female teams at public schools and universities. The decision resolves whether the Equal Protection Clause allows a state to require school athletes to compete based on biological sex.

Impact

The answer affects transgender students who want to join girls' or women's teams and the schools that set eligibility rules. It also matters to states considering similar sports laws.

What's next

Lower courts and schools will study the opinion and apply it to Idaho's law and similar cases. State officials, universities, and athletic programs may need to change or defend their rules based on the decision's reasoning.

What was the core dispute in Bradley Little v. Hecox?

The case asked whether Idaho may require school athletes to compete based on biological sex instead of gender identity. Lindsay Hecox argued that the rule violates equal protection.

Who is most affected by this decision?

Transgender students, public schools, and colleges are directly affected. The ruling also gives guidance to other states writing or defending similar sports laws.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?

Lower courts must apply the Supreme Court's answer in this case and related disputes. Schools and state officials will review team-eligibility policies for compliance.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court has now answered a major constitutional question about transgender participation in school sports, and that answer will shape policies beyond Idaho.

Impact

The answer affects transgender students who want to join girls' or women's teams and the schools that set eligibility rules. It also matters to states considering similar sports laws.

Not official Court text.

Timing

Decided June 30, 2026

The Court released its decision 168 days after oral argument on January 13, 2026. The median for cases argued in January is 127 days.

Based on 30 merits cases argued in January since 1995.Argument and decision days