No. 24-38October Term 2025Decided Jun 30, 2026
Bradley Little, Governor of Idaho, et al., Petitioners v. Lindsay Hecox, et al.
The Court has now answered a major constitutional question about transgender participation in school sports, and that answer will shape policies beyond Idaho.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jun 30, 2026
- What it's about
A transgender woman challenges Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, which prohibits transgender girls and women from participating on female sports teams at public schools and universities. The case, brought by Lindsay Hecox who wanted to compete on Boise State's women's cross-country team, tests whether such bans violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Question presented
May a state, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, categorically require sports participants to compete based on their biological sex, rather than gender identity?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jun 30, 2026
- Area
Civil Rights
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court released a decision in the fight over Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, which bars transgender girls and women from female teams at public schools and universities. The decision resolves whether the Equal Protection Clause allows a state to require school athletes to compete based on biological sex.
Impact
The answer affects transgender students who want to join girls' or women's teams and the schools that set eligibility rules. It also matters to states considering similar sports laws.
What's next
Lower courts and schools will study the opinion and apply it to Idaho's law and similar cases. State officials, universities, and athletic programs may need to change or defend their rules based on the decision's reasoning.
What was the core dispute in Bradley Little v. Hecox?
The case asked whether Idaho may require school athletes to compete based on biological sex instead of gender identity. Lindsay Hecox argued that the rule violates equal protection.
Who is most affected by this decision?
Transgender students, public schools, and colleges are directly affected. The ruling also gives guidance to other states writing or defending similar sports laws.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?
Lower courts must apply the Supreme Court's answer in this case and related disputes. Schools and state officials will review team-eligibility policies for compliance.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court has now answered a major constitutional question about transgender participation in school sports, and that answer will shape policies beyond Idaho.
Impact
The answer affects transgender students who want to join girls' or women's teams and the schools that set eligibility rules. It also matters to states considering similar sports laws.
Not official Court text.
Timing
Decided June 30, 2026
The Court released its decision 168 days after oral argument on January 13, 2026. The median for cases argued in January is 127 days.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials9
Supreme Court docket 24-38
docket | Jun 30, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jun 30, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 8, 2026
Oral Arguments - Little
audio | Jan 13, 2026
Petition
brief | Jul 11, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026