Review of court clerk rulings

1. Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit owes a clear, indisputable, non-discretionary, and ministerial duty to submit for judicial determination a motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(b) and 11th Circuit Rule 27-2 seeking reconsideration, vacatur, or modification of an order of its own Clerk, where the delegating rule makes clerical authority expressly "subject to review by the court," where no judicial officer of that court has acted upon the motion, and where no order of that court addresses it. 2. Whether a writ of mandamus issued by this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) is the only adequate remedy available to Petitioner, where a clerk’s disposition of the motion invoking judicial review yields no appealable order and no judgment from which certiorari may be sought under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1); where no district court may compel a court of appeals to act; where that court cannot issue mandamus to itself; where rehearing is exhausted; and where 11th Circuit Rule 27-3 forbids any successive motion for reconsideration. 3. Is mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) the only adequate remedy when a clerk’s disposition creates no appealable order or certiorari-eligible judgment (§ 1254(1)), no district court can compel the court of appeals, the court can’t mandamus itself, rehearing is exhausted, and 11th Cir. R. 27-3 bars successive reconsideration?