Skip to main content

Border searches of phones

Daniel Samuel Eta v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Daniel Samuel Eta has asked the Supreme Court to review whether border officials may search a traveler’s phone without a warrant or a reason tied to customs enforcement, finding contraband, or deciding who may enter the country.
What's at stake
The unresolved question is what legal basis federal border officials need to search a traveler’s phone at the border.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

His petition says federal appeals courts disagree about what justification these searches require.

Eta’s petition says federal appeals courts disagree about how much justification border officials need to search a traveler’s phone.

Question presented

Whether the Fourth Amendment allows a traveler’s phone to be searched at the border without a warrant or any justification tied to the historical purposes of detecting contraband, enforcing customs laws, or determining admissibility.

What happens next

The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument is scheduled.

Documents

1

Docket activity

5
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Nov 4, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials from the Court and the parties. Grounded in docket records and cited sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings