Skip to main content

Semiautomatic rifle bans

Grant v. Higgins

Updated Sep 22, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Argument Scheduled

Oral argument December 2, 2026

Decision expected by late June 2027

What it’s about
The Supreme Court will consider a challenge to Connecticut’s restrictions on certain semiautomatic rifles, including AR-15-style rifles.
What's at stake
The case could affect Connecticut residents who want to possess covered semiautomatic rifles for lawful purposes. It could also shape how states regulate commonly owned rifles such as AR-15-style firearms.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Eddie Grant, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Ronnell Higgins, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Transportation, et al.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The case asks whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right to possess these commonly owned rifles for lawful purposes.

The dispute concerns the scope of constitutional protection for semiautomatic rifles that supporters describe as commonly used for lawful purposes.

Question presented

Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution guarantee the right to possess semiautomatic rifles that are in common use for lawful purposes, including the most popular rifle in the country, the AR-15?

What happens next

Expected by late June 2027

Argument is on the calendar for December 2, 2026. Decisions typically follow within about 97 days of argument. Nearly all opinions are released before the term ends in late June or early July 2027.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.

Argument and decision days

Documents

2

Docket activity

28
  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 22, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 22, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 18, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 18, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: title

    Sep 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 11, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: title

    Sep 7, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: title, argument_date

    Sep 4, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 4, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Sep 4, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is at stake in Grant v. Higgins?
The case asks whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect possession of certain semiautomatic rifles, including AR-15-style rifles, for lawful purposes.
Who could be affected by Grant v. Higgins?
Connecticut residents seeking to possess covered semiautomatic rifles could be affected. The case could also influence state rules for commonly owned rifles.
When is oral argument in Grant v. Higgins?
Oral argument is scheduled for December 2, 2026. A decision usually follows later in the same Court term.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 5, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis