Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. Gwynne A. Wilcox
Granted
No. 24A966·Stay application·Filed by the federal government·Presented to The Chief Justice·From United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
What did the Court do?
The Court granted the request on May 22, 2025: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Kagan, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Jackson would have ruled the other way.
Filed · Ruled · 43 days after filing
What's being asked
The federal government asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause two District of Columbia federal court orders. Those orders blocked President Trump's removal of National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox and Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris. The government argues the President may remove them without giving a specific reason, although the laws require a specific reason.
What the Court did
The Court gave the government emergency help by granting a stay (temporary pause) of two district-court orders. It remains in place through the D.C. Circuit appeal and, if review is timely requested, until the Supreme Court case ends. It did not decide whether removal protections apply to either board; Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson disagreed with the result (dissented).
The order records the positions of 3 of 9 justices. The Court usually does not say how each justice voted on an emergency application, so the rest are shown as not published.
Filing60 days
Half of 300 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 28 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 43 days after filing.
What it means
The temporary pause does not decide who wins the underlying cases. The appeals continue in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; no related Supreme Court case or argument date is listed.
Separate writings
Justice Kagan, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson, dissenting
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A966. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.