Skip to main content

Emergency application

Kristi Noem, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security v. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia

Granted in part
No. 24A949Vacatur applicationFiled by the federal governmentPresented to The Chief JusticeFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court granted part of the request on April 10, 2025 and wiped out (vacated) part of the lower-court order it challenged.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 3 days after filing

What's being asked

The federal government asks the Supreme Court to undo (vacate) a lower-court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The case is Kristi Noem, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security v. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia.

What the Court did

The application is granted in part and denied in part, subject to the direction of this order. Due to the administrative stay issued by The Chief Justice, the deadline imposed by the District Court has now passed. To that extent, the Government’s emergency application is effectively granted in part and the deadline in the challenged order is no longer effective. The rest of the District Court’s order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand. The order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the District Court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps. The order heretofore entered by The Chief Justice is vacated. (Detached Opinion) Statement of Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson join, respecting the Court’s disposition of the application. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf'>Opinion</a>)

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Thomas
  2. Roberts
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayorwrote a statement
  5. Kaganjoined Sotomayor's writing
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jacksonjoined Sotomayor's writing
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Days from filing to a ruling for 97 rulings on applications decided without a response since January 1, 2025. The band is the middle half, the tick the median, and the mark this application: ruled 3 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Separate writings

  • Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson and Justice Kagan, respecting the order

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A949. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked September 24, 2026