Skip to main content

Emergency application

Notice before third-country deportations

Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D.

Granted
No. 24A1153Stay applicationFiled by the federal governmentPresented to Justice JacksonFrom United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court granted the request on June 23, 2025: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson would have ruled the other way.

Filed Ruled 27 days after filing

What's being asked

The federal government asks the Supreme Court to pause an April 18 preliminary injunction, a temporary court order, from a Massachusetts federal court. The dissent describes the dispute as involving federal officials’ third-country removals: sending noncitizens to countries other than their own. The government says the district court lacked authority to hear the case and that the four people’s claims to fair process have no merit.

What the Court did

The Court put the April 18 injunction on hold (stayed it), granting (approving) the federal government’s request for emergency help. The pause lasts while the First Circuit appeal continues and, if a party timely asks for Supreme Court review, until that review ends. It does not decide who wins the main dispute. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented (disagreed with the result); the Court did not publish the other justices’ votes.

  • Dissented
  • Wrote separately
  • Vote not published
Dissenting · 3recorded against the Court's order
  1. Sotomayorwrote a dissent
  2. Kaganjoined Sotomayor's writing
  3. Jacksonjoined Sotomayor's writing
Vote not published · 6the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Gorsuch
  5. Kavanaugh
  6. Barrett
The order records the positions of 3 of 9 justices. The Court usually does not say how each justice voted on an emergency application, so the rest are shown as not published.
Half of 82 rulings on applications where the Court asked for a response came 10 to 26 days after filing, and the median was 17 days; this one was ruled on 27 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary pause, not a final decision about who wins the underlying dispute. The First Circuit appeal continues. The docket lists no related case on the main legal question, and the Court set no argument date for this application.

Separate writings

  • Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson, dissenting

    Read (PDF)

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A1153. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026