Emergency application
Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D.
What did the Court do?
The Court granted the request on June 23, 2025: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson would have ruled the other way.
What's being asked
The federal government asks the Supreme Court to pause (stay) a lower-court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit while the appeal continues. The case is Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D..
What the Court did
The application for stay presented to Justice Jackson and by her referred to the Court is granted. The April 18, 2025, preliminary injunction of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, case No. 25–cv–10676, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of the Court. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson join, dissenting. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1153_l5gm.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
- Dissenting · 3recorded against the Court's order
What it means
This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Separate writings
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Jackson and Justice Kagan, dissenting
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 24A1153. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.