Emergency application
Gender markers on passports
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. Ashton Orr
What did the Court do?
The Court granted the request on November 6, 2025: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Jackson, Justice Kagan, and Justice Sotomayor would have ruled the other way.
What's being asked
The federal government, including President Donald Trump and the State Department, asks the Supreme Court to pause a lower-court order blocking its passport policy. The policy requires new passports to display a person's biological sex at birth. Ashton Orr and other challengers contest the policy; the government argues it is lawful.
What the Court did
The Court gave emergency help, putting the June 17 Massachusetts district court order on hold (staying it); it did not decide who wins. The pause lasts through the First Circuit appeal and any timely petition for Supreme Court review. Justice Jackson dissented (disagreed with the result), and Justices Kagan and Sotomayor signed on to her dissent; no vote tally was published.
- Dissented
- Wrote separately
- Vote not published
- Dissenting · 3recorded against the Court's order
What it means
The appeal continues in the First Circuit; no related Supreme Court case is listed, and no argument date was set for this application.
Separate writings
- Read (PDF)
Justice Jackson, joined by Justice Kagan and Justice Sotomayor, dissenting
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A319. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.