Skip to main content

Emergency application

Emergency orders during appeal

Katherine L. Hobbins Forester v. Adam Gerol

Awaiting action
No. 26A245Injunction applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice BarrettFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Has the Court ruled?

Not yet. The Court has not ruled on the request.

It was filed August 17, 2026.

Filed

What's being asked

Katherine L. Hobbins Forester and others ask the Supreme Court for an emergency injunction (a court order requiring or stopping action). They seek it while their appeal continues in the Seventh Circuit. The record does not say what the dispute concerns or what order the lower court made.

What happens next

Justice Barrett denied the first filing on August 27; Forester and others refiled on September 1, and that request is pending with Justice Thomas. The Court has not ruled on the refiling and can act at any time, with or without an explanation. No response deadline, referral to all justices, temporary pause, or argument date is listed; the Court can grant, deny, or partly grant it.

Half of 273 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 29 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one's latest docket entry came 15 days after filing.

What it means

Granting the requested emergency injunction (a court order requiring or stopping action) would give Forester and others that order during their Seventh Circuit appeal. An emergency ruling is temporary and does not decide who wins the underlying case; the appeal continues in the Seventh Circuit. No related case asking the Court to decide the main question is listed, and no argument date is set.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A245. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 7, 2026