Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

March 2025 oral arguments

10 cases across 7 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Seven argument days, March 3 to March 31, 2025. Three of them have more than one case.

2 cases
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited, et al., Petitioners v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., et al.Must plaintiffs prove minimum contacts before federal courts may assert personal jurisdiction over foreign states sued under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act?Decided 23-1201BLOM Bank SAL, Petitioner v. Michal Honickman, et al.Does Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard apply to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint?Decided 23-1259

1 case
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Estados Unidos MexicanosCan U.S. gun manufacturers be held liable for violence in Mexico under theories of proximate causation and aiding and abetting, based on their domestic production and sale of firearms that are later trafficked to Mexican cartels?Decided 23-1141

1 case
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.1. Can a nonparty challenge a federal agency’s “final order” under the Hobbs Act’s judicial review provision? 2. Do federal nuclear laws allow the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license private companies to store spent nuclear fuel at off-reactor sites?Decided 23-1300

1 case
Pierre Yassue Nashun Riley, Petitioner v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General1. Is 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)’s 30-day deadline jurisdictional, or merely a mandatory claims-processing rule that can be waived or forfeited? 2. Can a person obtain review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision in a withholding-only proceeding by filing a petition within 30 days of that decision?Decided 23-1270

2 cases
Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.Does the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia have exclusive jurisdiction to review an Environmental Protection Agency action that affects only one state or region, simply because the EPA published that action alongside actions affecting other states in a single Federal Register notice?Decided 23-1067Environmental Protection Agency, Petitioner v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.Should challenges by small oil refineries seeking exemptions from the requirements of the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard program be heard exclusively in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit because the agency’s denial actions are “nationally applicable” or “based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect”?Decided 23-1229

1 case
Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.Did Congress violate the Constitution in the way it delegated power to the FCC to collect Universal Service Fund money, and did the FCC violate the Constitution by letting a private, industry-controlled company make those collection decisions?Decided 24-354

2 cases
Danny Richard Rivers, Petitioner v. Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionDoes 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) apply to all second habeas petitions, or only specific types of second petitions?Decided 23-1345Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission, et al.Does a state violate the First Amendment’s religion clauses by denying a religious organization an otherwise-available tax exemption because the organization does not meet the state’s criteria for religious behavior?Decided 24-154