Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

April 2025 oral arguments

12 cases across 8 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Eight argument days, April 1 to April 30, 2025. Four of them have more than one case.

1 case
Miriam Fuld, et al., Petitioners v. Palestine Liberation Organization, et al.Does the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment?Decided 24-20

1 case
Eunice Medina, Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, et al.Does the Medicaid Act’s “any qualified provider” provision unambiguously confer a private right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider?Decided 23-1275

2 cases
Donte Parrish, Petitioner v. United StatesMust a party who files a notice of appeal during the period between when their original appeal deadline expired and when the court reopens their time to appeal file a second notice after the reopening is granted?Decided 24-275Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Braidwood Management, Inc., et al.Does the structure of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force violate the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, and if so, is the provision that insulates the task force from the Health & Human Services secretary’s supervision severable from the rest of the statute?Decided 24-316

2 cases
Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.Do public schools burden parents’ religious exercise when they compel elementary school children to participate in instruction on gender and sexuality against their parents’ religious convictions and without notice or opportunity to opt out?Decided 24-297Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner v. Jennifer ZuchWhether a proceeding under 26 U.S.C. 6330 for a pre-deprivation determination about a levy proposed by the Internal Revenue Service to collect unpaid taxes becomes moot when there is no longer a live dispute over the proposed levy that gave rise to the proceeding?Decided 24-416

1 case
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.Do the fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge the EPA's approval of California regulations that require automakers to manufacture more electric vehicles and fewer gasoline-powered vehicles?Decided 24-7

2 cases
A. J. T., By and Through Her Parents, A. T. & G. T., Petitioner v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279, et al.Do the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require children with disabilities to satisfy a “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education?Decided 24-249Simon A. Soto, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioner v. United StatesWhen disabled combat veterans claim past-due compensation, should the military use the CRSC statute's rules to calculate how far back they can be paid, or should it use the Barring Act's six-year limit?Decided 24-320

2 cases
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, dba Labcorp, Petitioner v. Luke Davis, et al.May a federal court certify a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) when some members of the proposed class lack any Article III injury?Decided 24-304Curtrina Martin, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of G. W., a Minor, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.1. Does the Supremacy Clause prevent individuals from suing the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act when federal employees’ actions, even if negligent or wrongful, are related to carrying out federal policy and can be interpreted as following federal laws? 2. Is the discretionary-function exception, which usually protects the government from being sued for certain decisions made by its employees, always inapplicable when dealing with claims related to law enforcement officers’ actions that fall under the intentional torts category?Decided 24-362

1 case
Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board, et al., Petitioners v. Gentner Drummond, Attorney General of Oklahoma, ex rel. Oklahoma1. Are a privately owned and operated school’s educational decisions considered state action simply because the school has a contract with the state to provide free education to students? 2. Does the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause prohibit, or the Establishment Clause require, a state to exclude religious schools from its charter-school program?Decided 24-394