Skip to main content

No. 23-1259October Term 2024Decided Jun 5, 2025

Docket 23-1259October Term 2024 (2024–2025)

BLOM Bank SAL, Petitioner v. Michal Honickman, et al.

The Supreme Court held that a party seeking to reopen a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) must demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, even if their goal is merely to file an amended complaint.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 5, 2025
Case AcceptedOct 4, 2024
Arguments HeardMar 3, 2025
Decision ReleasedJun 5, 2025
What it's about

The Supreme Court held that a party seeking to reopen a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) must demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, even if their goal is merely to file an amended complaint. The Court rejected the argument that the more lenient standard for amending pleadings under Rule 15(a) should relax the strict requirements for vacating a judgment.

Question presented

Does Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6)’s stringent standard apply to a post-judgment request to vacate for the purpose of filing an amended complaint?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit / Decision released Jun 5, 2025

Area

Decided Supreme Court case