Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

March 2026 oral arguments

10 cases across 8 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Eight argument days, March 2 to March 31, 2026. Two of them have more than one case.

1 case
United States, Petitioner v. Ali Danial HemaniDoes a federal law that prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” violate the respondent’s Second Amendment right to bear arms?Decided 24-1234

1 case
Munson P. Hunter, III, Petitioner v. United States1. Does an appeal waiver bar all claims except for ineffective assistance of counsel or a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum? 2. Does such a waiver become ineffective if the sentencing judge later tells the defendant they can appeal, and the government fails to object?Decided 24-1063

1 case
Shawn Montgomery, Petitioner v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al.Does 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c) preempt a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver?Decided 24-1238

1 case
Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State, Petitioner v. Republican National Committee, et al.Do the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots that are cast by federal election day to be received by election officials after that day?Decided 24-1260

2 cases
Markwayne Mullin, Secretary of Homeland Security v. Al Otro Lado, a California CorporationDoes a noncitizen who is stopped on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border “arrive[] in the United States” within the meaning of Immigration and Nationality Act?Decided 25-5Thomas Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, IncorporatedMay the doctrine of judicial estoppel be invoked to bar a plaintiff who fails to disclose a civil claim in bankruptcy filings from pursuing that claim simply because there is a potential motive for nondisclosure, regardless of whether there is evidence that the plaintiff in fact acted in bad faith?Decided 25-6

1 case
Flowers Foods, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Angelo BrockAre workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce—but who do not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles that cross borders—“transportation workers” “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of the exemption in Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act?Decided 24-935

2 cases
Ahmad Abouammo v. United StatesIs venue proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there?Decided 25-5146Adrian Jules v. Andre Balazs PropertiesDoes a federal court that initially exercises jurisdiction and stays a case pending arbitration maintain jurisdiction over a post-arbitration Section 9 or 10 application where jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking?Decided 25-83

1 case
Terry Pitchford, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, et al.Did the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably decide—under the standards set by federal habeas law—that Terry Pitchford gave up his right to argue that the prosecutor’s explanations for striking four Black jurors were false or racially biased?Decided 24-7351