Skip to main content

No. 24-1238October Term 2025Decided May 14, 2026

Docket 24-1238October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Shawn Montgomery, Petitioner v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al.

The Court shut down this kind of state negligent-selection lawsuit against freight brokers under the federal trucking statute.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 14, 2026
Case AcceptedOct 3, 2025
Arguments HeardMar 4, 2026
Decision ReleasedMay 14, 2026
What it's about

After Shawn Montgomery was seriously injured in a highway crash involving a truck hired to carry a shipment, he sued the freight broker that chose the motor carrier, claiming the broker negligently selected an unsafe carrier or driver. The Supreme Court is addressing whether federal law governing motor carriers and brokers wipes out that kind of state-law negligence claim against a broker.

Question presented

Does 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c) preempt a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released May 14, 2026

Area

Maritime Law

Briefing

What it's about

Shawn Montgomery sued a freight broker after a truck crash, saying the broker negligently chose an unsafe motor carrier or driver. The Supreme Court said the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act blocks that state common-law claim and that the claim does not fit the law's safety exception.

Impact

The decision makes it harder for injured people to sue freight brokers under state negligence law after trucking crashes. For example, someone hurt in a truck wreck may now have to focus on claims against the carrier or driver instead of the broker that arranged the shipment.

What's next

Lower courts will apply this ruling in similar cases and are likely to reject state negligent-selection claims against brokers. Brokers, insurers, carriers, and injured plaintiffs will adjust their lawsuits and business practices to account for that limit.

What was the main dispute in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II?

The fight was over whether federal trucking law overrides a state negligence claim against a broker for choosing an unsafe carrier or driver.

What are the real-world effects of the decision?

It narrows one path for people injured in truck crashes to seek damages from freight brokers. Brokers gain stronger protection from this type of state-law claim.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?

Lower courts will use this ruling in similar broker-liability cases. The parties and other litigants must proceed under the Court's reading of the federal statute.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court shut down this kind of state negligent-selection lawsuit against freight brokers under the federal trucking statute.

Impact

People injured in truck crashes, and the brokers arranging shipments, are directly affected. The Court said federal law does not block state negligent-hiring claims against brokers. For example, an injured driver may still sue a broker for choosing an unsafe carrier. Next, more state-law safety cases against brokers may continue in court. States keep authority over motor vehicle safety, even though federal law broadly limits some trucking regulation.

Not official Court text.

Timing

Decided May 14, 2026

The Court released its decision 71 days after oral argument on March 4, 2026. The median for cases argued in March is 83 days.

Based on 44 merits cases argued in March since 1995.Argument and decision days