No. 24-1238October Term 2025Decided May 14, 2026Updated Sep 2, 2026
Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II
Shawn Montgomery, Petitioner v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, et al.
Federal law blocks Montgomery's state-law negligent-selection claim against the freight broker.
Case status
Decided 9-0 · May 14, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Barrett
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released May 14, 2026
- What it's about
The Court unanimously ruled for Shawn Montgomery, holding that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act does not block a state-law claim that a freight broker negligently selected a motor carrier. The Court said the claim falls within the law’s exception preserving state authority over motor-vehicle safety, and it reversed the Seventh Circuit’s judgment.
Question presented
Does 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c) preempt a state common-law claim against a broker for negligently selecting a motor carrier or driver?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released May 14, 2026
- Area
Maritime Law
Decision
What the Court decided
Federal law blocks Montgomery's state-law negligent-selection claim against the freight broker.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
People injured in truck crashes and transportation brokers that arrange shipments are affected. Injured people may bring negligent-hiring claims (claims that a broker carelessly chose an unsafe carrier or driver). For example, Montgomery may pursue his claim involving C.H. Robinson and Caribe. The ruling preserves state authority over motor-vehicle safety through these claims. Other trucking laws without a safety connection may remain preempted (blocked by federal law).
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 9-0
- Majority author
- Amy Coney Barrett
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The Court decided that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act overrides (preempts) Montgomery's state-law claim that a freight broker negligently chose an unsafe carrier or driver. The Court also concluded that the claim was not covered by the law's safety exception.
Vote
Impact
People injured in truck crashes may be unable to bring this type of state negligence claim against a freight broker. For example, a person hurt by a carrier chosen by a broker cannot use this claim if it is preempted under the Court's decision.
What's next
Lower courts must apply the decision in similar lawsuits against freight brokers. Parties with pending negligent-selection claims will need to assess whether federal law bars those claims.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II?
The Court decided that federal trucking law preempts Montgomery's state-law negligence claim against the freight broker. The safety exception did not apply.
Who is affected by the Montgomery decision?
Truck-crash victims, freight brokers, and motor carriers are affected. Similar state claims alleging that a broker chose an unsafe carrier or driver may be barred.
What happens next after Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II?
Lower courts will apply the decision to similar cases. Parties in pending broker-negligence suits must evaluate whether the federal law blocks their claims.
Timing
Decided May 14, 2026
The Court released its decision 71 days after oral argument on March 4, 2026. The median for cases argued in March is 83 days.
Documents
Opinions
Amy Coney Barrett
Orders
Audio
Key filings
Briefs on file: 31View on supremecourt.gov
Activity
Docket activity8
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
Sep 2, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Sep 2, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - AB
May 14, 2026 | Court records
Brief added: Questions Presented
Mar 31, 2026 | Court records
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
Mar 4, 2026 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Jun 2, 2025 | Court records
Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Feb 27, 2025 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 24-1238
docket | Sep 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Sep 3, 2026
Opinion of the Court (Amy Coney Barrett)
opinion | May 14, 2026
Questions Presented
brief | Mar 31, 2026
Oral argument
audio | Mar 4, 2026
Petition
brief | Jun 2, 2025
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Feb 27, 2025
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 2, 2026