Skip to main content

No. 24-1260October Term 2025Decided Jun 29, 2026

Docket 24-1260October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State, Petitioner v. Republican National Committee, et al.

For federal elections, Mississippi cannot count ballots that arrive after Election Day even if they were cast by that day.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 29, 2026
Case AcceptedNov 10, 2025
Arguments HeardMar 23, 2026
Decision ReleasedJun 29, 2026
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Question presented

Do the federal election-day statutes preempt a state law that allows ballots that are cast by federal election day to be received by election officials after that day?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit / Decision released Jun 29, 2026

Area

Elections

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court said federal election-day laws override a Mississippi rule that let ballots cast by Election Day be received by election officials shortly after that day in federal races. The case asked whether federal law leaves states room to count those late-arriving ballots.

Vote

The Court ruled for Mississippi Secretary of State Michael Watson and said the federal election-day statutes preempt the state law, but the prompt does not provide the vote count or opinion lineup.

Impact

Mississippi election officials cannot use that extra receipt period for federal elections after this decision. For example, a voter who mails a ballot on time but it arrives after Election Day could have that ballot rejected for federal offices.

What's next

Lower courts must apply the Supreme Court's answer in any remaining proceedings tied to Mississippi's rule. Mississippi election officials now need to run future federal elections under rules that match this decision.

What was the core dispute in this case?

The fight was over whether federal election-day laws block Mississippi from counting ballots received after Election Day. Those ballots still had to be cast by Election Day under state law.

What real-world effect does the ruling have on voters and election officials?

Election officials in Mississippi must stop using a post-Election-Day receipt window for federal races. Voters who rely on mail delivery after that day face a greater risk their federal ballot will not count.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?

Lower courts must follow this answer in any related case. Mississippi must adjust its federal-election practices to match the ruling.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

For federal elections, Mississippi cannot count ballots that arrive after Election Day even if they were cast by that day.

Result
Reversed

Impact

Mississippi absentee voters are most affected, including away-from-home students and seniors. State law counts ballots postmarked by election day if they arrive within five business days. Example: a student mailing a ballot on election day could still be counted later. The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit and sent the case back for more proceedings. Other states with similar absentee rules may look to this case closely.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided June 29, 2026

The Court released its decision 98 days after oral argument on March 23, 2026. The median for cases argued in March is 83 days.

Based on 44 merits cases argued in March since 1995.Argument and decision days

Coverage

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Mississippi rule on mail ballots. It lets officials count ballots postmarked by Election Day if they arrive within five business days.