Skip to main content
Docket 25-5146October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Ahmad Abouammo, Petitioner v. United States

Ahmad Abouammo, a former Twitter employee, was convicted of gathering nonpublic information for a Saudi official. The Supreme Court will decide if he can be tried in a judicial district where none of his actual criminal conduct occurred, based solely on where the effects of his actions were intended to be felt.

Case overview

Dispute
Ahmad Abouammo, a former Twitter employee, was convicted of gathering nonpublic information for a Saudi official. The Supreme Court will decide if he can be tried in a judicial district where none of his actual criminal conduct occurred, based solely on where the effects of his actions were intended to be felt.
Issue
The Court is deciding whether is venue proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there.
Current posture
Argued Mar 30, 2026.

Question

Question presented

Is venue proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there?

Plain English

The Court is deciding whether is venue proper in a district where no offense conduct took place, so long as the statute’s intent element “contemplates” effects that could occur there.

Procedural posture

Case AcceptedDec 5, 2025
Arguments HeardMar 30, 2026
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
Originating court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Supreme Court review
Granted Dec 5, 2025
Argument
Held Mar 30, 2026
Opinion
Not released

Who is watching

Legal area
Criminal Procedure
Institutional path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision under Supreme Court review
What changes next
The next public milestone is the Court's disposition.
Term context
Awaiting Decision in October Term 2025 (2025–2026)