Skip to main content

Flowers Foods v. Brock

Updated Sep 3, 2026

In brief

Local delivery workers can fall within the Federal Arbitration Act exemption when their deliveries are part of goods' interstate journey.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · May 28, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Gorsuch

What it’s about
The Court unanimously ruled for Angelo Brock, holding that a worker who transports goods within one state as part of their continuous trip between states may be exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act’s requirement to enforce arbitration agreements.
Who it affects
Some local delivery workers may be able to take work disputes to court instead of being required to arbitrate (resolve disputes outside court). For example, a driver delivering out-of-state bakery goods to local stores may qualify for the exemption.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Flowers Foods, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Angelo Brock
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The worker need not personally cross state lines or handle vehicles that do to qualify for the exemption.

The decision defines when workers are engaged in interstate commerce under the Federal Arbitration Act's transportation-worker exemption.

Question presented

Are workers who deliver locally goods that travel in interstate commerce—but who do not transport the goods across borders nor interact with vehicles that cross borders—“transportation workers” “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of the exemption in Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act?

What the Court decided

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Gorsuchwrote the opinion
  2. Roberts
  3. Thomas
  4. Alito
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Kagan
  7. Barrett
  8. Kavanaugh
  9. Jackson
9 justices joined the judgment.

From the opinions

“A worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for the exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do.”

— Justice Neil Gorsuch(majority)

What's next

Lower courts must apply the Court's rule when deciding whether local delivery workers are exempt from arbitration agreements. Employers and workers may reassess whether disputes involving intrastate delivery routes belong in court or arbitration.

Documents

4

Docket activity

14
  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 2, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 2, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 2, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 2, 2026 · Generated

Show 7 more
  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 2, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 1, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Aug 2, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Aug 1, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - NG

    May 28, 2026 · Court records

  • Status changed from unknown to unknown

    Mar 25, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Brock

    Mar 13, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What did the Supreme Court rule in Flowers Foods v. Brock?
The Court said a worker can qualify for the transportation-worker exemption while moving goods only within one state. The goods must be on an interstate journey.
Who is affected by Flowers Foods v. Brock?
Local delivery workers moving goods that previously traveled across state lines may be affected. Employers may be unable to require arbitration for covered workers' disputes.
What happens next after Flowers Foods v. Brock?
Lower courts will use this rule in disputes over arbitration agreements. Parties will need to show whether the worker's deliveries were part of an interstate journey.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 2, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis