Skip to main content

Green cards after asylum ends

Wassily v. Blanche

Updated Oct 13, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Argument Scheduled

Oral argument November 30, 2026

Decision expected by late June 2027

What it’s about
The Court will decide whether a noncitizen whose asylum was later terminated can still seek lawful permanent resident status based on having previously been granted asylum.
What's at stake
The answer could determine whether a noncitizen with terminated asylum may apply for a green card, if other statutory criteria are met. It could affect people seeking a stable immigration status after losing asylum.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Tamer S. Wassily, et al., Petitioners v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The case concerns a split among federal appeals courts over the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b).

The case asks the Court to resolve conflicting appeals-court interpretations of an immigration law governing adjustment to lawful permanent resident status.

Question presented

Whether noncitizens who were "granted asylum," but whose asylum was later terminated, are eligible for adjustment to LPR status under Section 1159(b) (as the Fifth Circuit held), or are categorically ineligible (as the Second and Fourth Circuits held)?

What happens next

Expected by late June 2027

Argument is on the calendar for November 30, 2026. Decisions typically follow within about 93 days of argument. Nearly all opinions are released before the term ends in late June or early July 2027.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.

Argument and decision days

Documents

2

Docket activity

28
  • New document added

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 9, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 9, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 9, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 9, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 2, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 18, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 17, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, proceeding_type

    Sep 15, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: title, argument_date

    Sep 4, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is at stake in Wassily v. Blanche?
The case concerns whether people whose asylum ended may still apply for lawful permanent resident status under Section 1159(b).
Who could be affected by the Court's decision?
Noncitizens whose asylum was terminated could be affected if they seek a green card and meet other statutory criteria.
When will the Supreme Court hear Wassily v. Blanche?
Oral argument has not yet been scheduled. The Court may next issue a scheduling order or take another procedural step.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 3, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis