Skip to main content

Excessive property forfeitures

Jouppi v. Alaska

Updated Oct 13, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Argument Scheduled

Oral argument December 1, 2026

Decision expected by late June 2027

What it’s about
The Supreme Court will decide whether Alaska’s forfeiture of Kenneth Jouppi’s $95,000 airplane for transporting a passenger who had a six-pack of beer was an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment.
What's at stake
The answer could affect people challenging large fines as out of proportion to their wrongdoing. For example, a person facing a major financial penalty could receive a more individualized review of the conduct behind it.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Kenneth J. Jouppi, Petitioner v. Alaska
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The case concerns how courts should measure the seriousness of an offense when deciding whether a forfeiture is proportional to the wrongdoing.

The case tests how closely the Eighth Amendment's protection against excessive fines ties a penalty to the particular facts of a person's offense.

Question presented

Whether, in determining whether a fine contravenes the Excessive Fines Clause, courts may consider the gravity of the underlying offense purely in the abstract or should consider the gravity of the specific defendant's wrongdoing.

What happens next

Expected by late June 2027

Argument is on the calendar for December 1, 2026. Decisions typically follow within about 93 days of argument. Nearly all opinions are released before the term ends in late June or early July 2027.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.

Argument and decision days

Documents

3

Docket activity

29
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Show 7 more
  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

  • Case data updated: documents, description, document_url, proceeding_type

    Oct 13, 2026 · supremecourt.gov

Older entries are on the full docket.

More questions

3
What is at stake in Jouppi v. Alaska?
The case concerns whether courts must examine a defendant's own conduct when deciding if a fine is unconstitutionally excessive.
Who could be affected by the Jouppi v. Alaska decision?
People challenging large fines could be affected, especially if their individual conduct differs from the typical version of an offense.
When will the Supreme Court hear Jouppi v. Alaska?
Oral argument has not been scheduled. The next public milestone is likely an argument date or another scheduling action.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 2, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis